H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Rita Grande H2H: 2-0
Lindsay Davenport holds a 2–0 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2003 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 6-1 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2001* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 6-2 | Rita Grande | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Davenport | Rita Grande | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |