H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 7-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 7–0 lead over Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 6–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Age 53 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 21, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lindsay Davenport #5 6-2 6-3 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data
Sep 2, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-0 6-2 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data
Aug 28, 1999* New Haven WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 4-6 6-2 6-0 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data
Apr 3, 1998* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Lindsay Davenport #2 1-6 6-3 7-5 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data
Mar 9, 1998* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-2 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data
Jan 28, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-0 6-0 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data
Mar 11, 1997* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #8 6-2 6-1 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie — — — 1,961 186 180 50.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1993 13–15 46.4% — 1,584 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1994 10–15 40.0% — 1,589 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1995 17–16 51.5% — 1,664 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1996 31–15 67.4% — 1,849 0 3
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1997 37–26 58.7% — 1,778 0 4
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1998 18–25 41.9% — 1,696 0 4
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1999 30–22 57.7% — 1,832 0 4
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2000 20–24 45.5% — 1,685 0 4
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2001 9–17 34.6% — 1,547 0 4
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 — — — — — — —
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2003 0–2 0.0% — 1,515 0 4
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 2004 1–3 25.0% — 1,508 0 4
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —