H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 7-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 7–0 lead over Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 6–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Australian Open round of 128 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main-draw meetings
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
ROU Age 53 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lindsay Davenport #5 6-2 6-3 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Jan 21, 2004* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 6-0 6-2 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Sep 2, 1999* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 4-6 6-2 6-0 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Aug 28, 1999* SF New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 1-6 6-3 7-5 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Apr 3, 1998* R16 Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-2 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Mar 5, 1998 R16 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #3 6-0 6-0 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Jan 28, 1998* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Lindsay Davenport #8 6-2 6-1 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie Match data Mar 15, 1997* R16 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,374 711 191 78.8% 3 1 11 1 26 13 55
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie — — — 1,960 186 182 50.5% 0 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,041 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,964 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1996 47–15 75.8% #9 2,065 0 7 1993 13–15 46.4% — 1,584 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,166 0 13 1994 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,286 1 19 1995 17–16 51.5% — 1,663 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,327 2 26 1996 31–16 66.0% — 1,845 0 3
24 2000 57–14 80.3% #2 2,253 3 30 1997 37–26 58.7% — 1,778 0 4
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,298 3 37 1998 18–25 41.9% — 1,696 0 4
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,165 3 37 1999 30–22 57.7% — 1,831 0 4
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,074 3 38 2000 20–25 44.4% — 1,671 0 4
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,208 3 45 2001 9–17 34.6% — 1,542 0 4
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,215 3 51 — — — — — — —
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,132 3 51 2003 0–2 0.0% — 1,510 0 4
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,156 3 53 2004 1–3 25.0% — 1,504 0 4
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,111 3 55 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lindsay Davenport Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 18 8 26 69.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 21 6 27 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 15 8 23 65.2% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 29 6 35 82.9% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1993 3 7 10 30.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1997 36 8 44 81.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1994 2 5 7 28.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1998 43 7 50 86.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1995 5 5 10 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1999 33 8 41 80.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 1996 7 6 13 53.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2000 41 9 50 82.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 20 9 29 69.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 2001 51 9 60 85.0% — — — — 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
26 2002 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1999 12 10 22 54.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2003 30 10 40 75.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2000 7 12 19 36.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
28 2004 40 5 45 88.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 2 10 12 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2005 38 7 45 84.4% 11 2 13 84.6% 6 1 7 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2007 13 1 14 92.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 18 4 22 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 471 116 587 80.2% 106 33 139 76.3% 55 16 71 77.5% 79 26 105 75.2% — 62 75 137 45.3% 95 64 159 59.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 10 27 37 27.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 114/278 of Lindsay Davenport's and 1/4 of Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lindsay Davenport Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 2003 13/63 3.1 3.8 57.5% 72.0% 48.9% 70.1% 61.3% 62.1% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 20/74 4.7 3.3 61.0% 76.7% 48.0% 71.2% 55.1% 65.5% 51.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 28/69 5.6 5.0 59.7% 73.5% 46.4% 56.5% 54.0% 62.4% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 19/29 3.9 3.5 57.9% 67.9% 53.5% 56.9% 47.3% 61.8% 47.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 9/14 4.9 3.6 57.3% 72.4% 53.0% 46.7% 63.5% 64.0% 52.9% 2004 1/4 2.0 5.0 60.0% 55.6% 29.2% 54.5% 33.3% 45.0% 37.0%
32 2008 25/29 6.0 4.0 58.0% 74.4% 51.4% 48.4% 54.3% 65.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 114/902 4.9 4.0 58.8% 73.1% 49.8% 58.1% 54.7% 63.6% 49.2% — 1/368 2.0 5.0 60.0% 55.6% 29.2% 54.5% 33.3% 45.0% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lindsay Davenport Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1505 103.8 — — — — +36 — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1512 119.7 — — — — +67 0 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 — — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1859 149.8 — — — — -28 -178 -240 61.3% +0.93 11–3 (79%) 4–4 (50%) 111.2 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 2041 168.7 — — — — -27 -191 -346 69.7% +1.73 11–7 (61%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 -2.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1964 155.1 — — — — -15 -55 -216 64.4% +1.21 10–5 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.2 +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 2066 172.6 — — — — +4 -68 -253 73.5% +1.73 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -1.62 1993 1584 120.7 — — — — -73 +68 +30 45.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 101.1 +0.86
21 1997 2166 175.6 — — — — +24 -154 — 74.4% +1.95 10–10 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 94.6 +0.58 1994 1590 113.2 — — — — -94 +83 — 44.1% -0.53 3–6 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 94.7 +0.90
22 1998 2287 180.4 — — — — +50 -220 -395 75.7% +1.94 16–7 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 105.2 -2.47 1995 1663 135.9 — — — — -137 +102 — 51.9% +0.39 5–6 (45%) 5–1 (83%) 102.1 +0.99
23 1999 2328 179.8 — — — — +19 -263 -303 82.2% +2.53 8–4 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 101.9 -1.25 1996 1846 133.4 — — — — -211 +41 -120 59.3% +0.43 16–5 (76%) 9–2 (82%) 115.9 +0.11
24 2000 2254 177.5 — — — — +41 — -106 76.8% +2.17 13–6 (68%) 8–8 (50%) 96.4 -2.76 1997 1778 145.5 — — — — -116 +159 +33 55.0% +0.30 15–10 (60%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 +0.55
25 2001 2298 174.7 — — — — +17 — -24 81.0% +2.19 13–4 (76%) 9–4 (69%) 103.0 -1.06 1998 1696 144.6 — — — — -43 +199 — 46.9% -0.16 4–10 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 96.4 -0.86
26 2002 2166 166.9 — — — — +25 — — 71.1% +1.46 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 90.6 -0.63 1999 1832 151.2 — — — — -61 +71 -133 55.6% +0.52 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 103.8 -0.42
27 2003 2075 165.9 +4.70 +4.45 1.328 56.1% +52 +20 +133 74.6% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 96.2 -0.74 2000 1672 134.5 — — — — -57 +196 +97 48.1% -0.24 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 97.6 -1.14
28 2004 2208 171.1 +7.65 +5.05 1.482 57.9% +54 -118 +45 83.1% +2.56 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 100.2 -0.46 2001 1543 113.9 — — — — +72 +132 +197 37.3% -0.58 3–6 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 91.5 +0.37
29 2005 2215 170.5 +5.92 +4.60 1.294 55.2% +26 -49 +49 79.2% +2.00 16–6 (73%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 -1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 2133 165.6 +4.92 +4.20 1.241 54.4% +19 — — 71.9% +1.67 4–4 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 97.4 -1.47 2003 1511 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12
31 2007 2157 145.6 +4.78 +3.86 1.472 58.3% +12 — — 83.9% +2.65 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.41 2004 1505 112.3 +1.16 +0.66 0.673 41.2% +91 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.20
32 2008 2112 144.2 +7.49 +3.10 1.375 56.0% -6 +44 — 80.0% +2.18 5–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2375 176.5 +6.17 +4.21 1.351 56.0% +22 -122 -126 74.8% +1.90 149–78 (66%) 95–72 (57%) 101.9 -1.91 — 1960 141.7 +1.16 +0.66 0.673 41.2% -80 +118 +9 50.4% +0.05 64–61 (51%) 38–33 (54%) 105.1 +0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.