H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 2-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 2–0 lead over Sabine Appelmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2000 Zurich fourth round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 13, 2000* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-1 Sabine Appelmans #50 Match data
Mar 20, 1999* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-0 6-3 Sabine Appelmans #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,923 279 202 58.0% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Sabine Appelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,468 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1992 26–15 63.4% #26 1,875 0 3
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,828 0 3
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1996 26–16 61.9% #21 1,843 0 7
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,856 0 7
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,721 0 7
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,777 0 7
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2000 20–22 47.6% #49 1,692 0 7
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,685 0 7
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —