H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 3-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 3–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2001 San Diego third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Sandra Cacic
USA Age 51 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 2, 2001* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 6-3 6-3 Sandra Cacic #94 Match data
Mar 10, 1998* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 7-5 Sandra Cacic #65 Match data
Jul 25, 1997* Stanford WTA 250 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 6-2 6-2 Sandra Cacic #80 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Sandra Cacic #409 #39 548 1,730 58 96 37.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Sandra Cacic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% #310 1,481 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1993 4–6 40.0% #76 1,534 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1994 12–16 42.9% #54 1,617 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1995 7–12 36.8% #114 1,602 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1996 9–12 42.9% #78 1,569 0 1
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1997 7–11 38.9% #60 1,581 0 1
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1998 7–16 30.4% #82 1,568 0 1
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1999 2–7 22.2% #188 1,518 0 1
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2000 0–1 0.0% #140 1,514 0 1
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2001 9–11 45.0% #117 1,583 0 1
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2002 0–1 0.0% #322 1,570 0 1
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2003 1–2 33.3% #395 1,552 0 1
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 — — — — — — —
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —