Home
/
H2H
/
Lindsay Davenport vs Steffi Graf
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Steffi Graf H2H: 6-9 (incl. walkovers)
Lindsay Davenport vs Steffi Graf: 6–8 excluding walkovers; 6–9 including 1 walkover. Across 15 main-draw results including walkovers, Steffi Graf leads 6–4 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1999 Wimbledon final 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H including walkovers
6
–
9
15 main-draw results
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Lindsay Davenport
#1
6-4 7-5
Steffi Graf
#3
Match data
Jul 5, 1999*
F
Wimbledon
Grand Slam
Grass
Steffi Graf
#6
6-1 6-7(5) 6-3
Lindsay Davenport
#2
Match data
Jun 3, 1999*
QF
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
Steffi Graf
#7
(w/o)
Lindsay Davenport
#2
Match data
Mar 23, 1999*
QF
Key Biscayne
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Lindsay Davenport
#1
6-2 7-5
Steffi Graf
#10
Match data
Jan 16, 1999*
SF
Sydney International
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Lindsay Davenport
#1
6-1 2-6 6-3
Steffi Graf
#12
Match data
Nov 16, 1998
SF
WTA Finals
WTA Finals
Carpet
Steffi Graf
#17
4-6 6-3 6-4
Lindsay Davenport
#1
Match data
Nov 15, 1998*
F
Philadelphia
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Carpet
Steffi Graf
#38
6-3 7-6
Lindsay Davenport
#2
Match data
Aug 29, 1998*
SF
New Haven
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Lindsay Davenport
#3
6-4 6-7 6-3
Steffi Graf
#57
Match data
Aug 1, 1998*
SF
Stanford
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Lindsay Davenport
#2
6-4 4-6 4-2 (ret.)
Steffi Graf
#45
Match data
Mar 5, 1998
SF
Indian Wells Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Steffi Graf
#1
6-4 7-6
Lindsay Davenport
#8
Match data
Nov 18, 1996
QF
WTA Finals
WTA Finals
Carpet
Lindsay Davenport
#10
6-3 6-3
Steffi Graf
#1
Match data
Aug 17, 1996*
SF
Manhattan Beach
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Steffi Graf
#1
6-4 6-4
Lindsay Davenport
#12
Match data
Mar 26, 1996*
SF
Key Biscayne
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Steffi Graf
#1
6-7 7-6 6-4
Lindsay Davenport
#12
Match data
Mar 17, 1996*
SF
Indian Wells Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Steffi Graf
#1
6-0 7-6
Lindsay Davenport
#13
Match data
Mar 16, 1994*
SF
Key Biscayne
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Steffi Graf
#1
6-3 6-2
Lindsay Davenport
#19
Match data
Jan 28, 1994*
QF
Australian Open
Grand Slam
Hard
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
Olympics
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Lindsay Davenport
#35
#1
6,100
2,374
711
191
78.8%
3
1
11
1
26
13
55
Steffi Graf
#3
#1
5,028
2,603
876
110
88.8%
22
1
15
5
32
32
107
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
12
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1981
1–1
50.0%
—
1,502
0
0
13
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1982
2–4
33.3%
—
1,507
0
0
14
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1983
6–7
46.2%
—
1,545
0
0
15
1991
1–2
33.3%
#348
1,504
0
0
1984
17–13
56.7%
#22
1,748
0
0
16
1992
2–5
28.6%
#161
1,512
0
0
1985
40–13
75.5%
#6
2,038
0
0
17
1993
31–15
67.4%
#20
1,858
0
1
1986
63–6
91.3%
#3
2,322
0
8
18
1994
44–15
74.6%
#6
2,041
0
3
1987
70–2
97.2%
#1
2,505
1
19
19
1995
31–14
68.9%
#12
1,964
0
4
1988
73–3
96.1%
#1
2,539
5
30
20
1996
47–15
75.8%
#9
2,065
0
7
1989
85–2
97.7%
#1
2,588
8
44
21
1997
57–16
78.1%
#3
2,166
0
13
1990
72–5
93.5%
#1
2,512
9
54
22
1998
68–14
82.9%
#1
2,286
1
19
1991
64–8
88.9%
#2
2,420
10
61
23
1999
58–11
84.1%
#2
2,327
2
26
1992
66–7
90.4%
#2
2,434
11
69
24
2000
57–14
80.3%
#2
2,253
3
30
1993
77–5
93.9%
#1
2,506
14
79
25
2001
64–10
86.5%
#1
2,298
3
37
1994
58–6
90.6%
#1
2,414
15
86
26
2002
24–9
72.7%
#12
2,165
3
37
1995
48–2
96.0%
#1
2,464
18
95
27
2003
48–15
76.2%
#5
2,074
3
38
1996
51–4
92.7%
#1
2,475
21
102
28
2004
64–10
86.5%
#1
2,208
3
45
1997
16–4
80.0%
#28
2,400
21
103
29
2005
58–11
84.1%
#1
2,215
3
51
1998
33–9
78.6%
#9
2,305
21
106
30
2006
21–8
72.4%
#25
2,132
3
51
1999
34–9
79.1%
#3
2,242
22
107
31
2007
13–1
92.9%
#72
2,156
3
53
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
2008
23–6
79.3%
#35
2,111
3
55
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
12
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1981
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
1
2
50.0%
13
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1982
—
—
—
—
2
3
5
40.0%
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
14
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1983
1
1
2
50.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
2
3
5
40.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
15
1991
1
2
3
33.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1984
5
3
8
62.5%
5
5
10
50.0%
7
4
11
63.6%
0
1
1
0.0%
16
1992
2
2
4
50.0%
0
3
3
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1985
19
6
25
76.0%
14
4
18
77.8%
3
1
4
75.0%
4
2
6
66.7%
17
1993
18
8
26
69.2%
8
3
11
72.7%
2
2
4
50.0%
3
2
5
60.0%
1986
20
3
23
87.0%
24
1
25
96.0%
—
—
—
—
19
2
21
90.5%
18
1994
21
6
27
77.8%
12
4
16
75.0%
4
1
5
80.0%
7
4
11
63.6%
1987
23
1
24
95.8%
32
0
32
100.0%
6
1
7
85.7%
9
0
9
100.0%
19
1995
15
8
23
65.2%
8
1
9
88.9%
3
1
4
75.0%
5
4
9
55.6%
1988
39
1
40
97.5%
20
1
21
95.2%
7
0
7
100.0%
7
1
8
87.5%
20
1996
29
6
35
82.9%
9
1
10
90.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
7
6
13
53.8%
1989
39
0
39
100.0%
25
2
27
92.6%
7
0
7
100.0%
14
0
14
100.0%
21
1997
36
8
44
81.8%
10
4
14
71.4%
1
1
2
50.0%
10
3
13
76.9%
1990
23
1
24
95.8%
20
2
22
90.9%
5
1
6
83.3%
24
1
25
96.0%
22
1998
43
7
50
86.0%
11
4
15
73.3%
4
1
5
80.0%
10
2
12
83.3%
1991
22
4
26
84.6%
19
2
21
90.5%
7
0
7
100.0%
16
2
18
88.9%
23
1999
33
8
41
80.5%
9
2
11
81.8%
7
0
7
100.0%
9
1
10
90.0%
1992
13
2
15
86.7%
25
3
28
89.3%
7
0
7
100.0%
21
2
23
91.3%
24
2000
41
9
50
82.0%
1
2
3
33.3%
7
2
9
77.8%
8
1
9
88.9%
1993
33
2
35
94.3%
21
1
22
95.5%
7
0
7
100.0%
16
2
18
88.9%
25
2001
51
9
60
85.0%
—
—
—
—
9
1
10
90.0%
4
0
4
100.0%
1994
38
2
40
95.0%
14
2
16
87.5%
0
1
1
0.0%
6
1
7
85.7%
26
2002
21
8
29
72.4%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3
1
4
75.0%
1995
22
1
23
95.7%
11
0
11
100.0%
7
0
7
100.0%
8
1
9
88.9%
27
2003
30
10
40
75.0%
10
3
13
76.9%
4
2
6
66.7%
4
0
4
100.0%
1996
21
1
22
95.5%
14
1
15
93.3%
7
0
7
100.0%
9
2
11
81.8%
28
2004
40
5
45
88.9%
13
3
16
81.3%
5
1
6
83.3%
6
1
7
85.7%
1997
3
1
4
75.0%
10
2
12
83.3%
—
—
—
—
3
1
4
75.0%
29
2005
38
7
45
84.4%
11
2
13
84.6%
6
1
7
85.7%
3
1
4
75.0%
1998
14
5
19
73.7%
—
—
—
—
6
2
8
75.0%
13
2
15
86.7%
30
2006
21
8
29
72.4%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1999
15
5
20
75.0%
9
1
10
90.0%
6
1
7
85.7%
4
2
6
66.7%
31
2007
13
1
14
92.9%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
2008
18
4
22
81.8%
4
1
5
80.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
471
116
587
80.2%
106
33
139
76.3%
55
16
71
77.5%
79
26
105
75.2%
—
350
39
389
90.0%
267
32
299
89.3%
84
14
98
85.7%
175
25
200
87.5%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.