H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 5-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 5–0 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2003 Tokyo quarterfinal 7-5 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 1, 2003* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #10 7-5 7-6(3) Tamarine Tanasugarn #31 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-1 Tamarine Tanasugarn #45 Match data
Aug 1, 1998* Stanford WTA 250 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 7-6 6-1 Tamarine Tanasugarn #41 Match data
Feb 1, 1997* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Lindsay Davenport #9 6-3 6-1 Tamarine Tanasugarn #57 Match data
Jan 19, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #9 6-1 6-0 Tamarine Tanasugarn #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4