H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 4-1

Lindsay Davenport holds a 4–1 lead over Tami Whitlinger Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1997 Wimbledon first round 5-7 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Tami Whitlinger Jones
USA Age 57

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 25, 1997* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Lindsay Davenport #8 5-7 6-2 6-2 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Mar 10, 1997* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #8 6-4 6-0 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Nov 3, 1995* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Lindsay Davenport #10 7-5 6-1 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Nov 10, 1994* Philadelphia WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Lindsay Davenport #7 7-5 6-3 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data
Aug 6, 1994* San Diego WTA 500 QF Hard Tami Whitlinger Jones (def.) Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Tami Whitlinger Jones — — — 1,786 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Tami Whitlinger Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1989 4–5 44.4% — 1,525 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1990 12–16 42.9% — 1,577 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1991 17–18 48.6% — 1,682 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1992 13–16 44.8% — 1,645 0 0
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1993 13–19 40.6% — 1,651 0 0
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1994 16–18 47.1% — 1,729 0 0
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1995 19–18 51.4% — 1,705 0 0
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1996 10–13 43.5% — 1,697 0 0
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1997 2–11 15.4% — 1,598 0 0
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 — — — — — — —
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —