H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 5-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 5–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Wimbledon third round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Lindsay Davenport #5 6-2 6-1 Tatiana Panova #122 Match data
Jan 19, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #10 6-2 6-1 Tatiana Panova #24 Match data
Jan 11, 2003* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #12 6-3 7-5 Tatiana Panova #27 Match data
Oct 18, 2002* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #10 6-2 6-2 Tatiana Panova #21 Match data
Aug 8, 2002* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #9 6-2 6-4 Tatiana Panova #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —