H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 2-0
Lindsay Davenport holds a 2–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1998 US Open third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 6-1 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1998* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | (w/o) | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
| Virginia Ruano Pascual | #998 | #28 | 893 | 1,819 | 199 | 235 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Davenport | Virginia Ruano Pascual | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #126 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 | 1997 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 | 1998 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 | 1999 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 | 2001 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #56 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 | 2005 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 | 2006 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #66 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #81 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #200 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |