H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 4-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 4–0 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1997 US Open second round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Wiltrud Probst
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #6 6-2 6-3 Wiltrud Probst #90 Match data
Jan 20, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 6-2 6-2 Wiltrud Probst #82 Match data
Jan 21, 1994* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #19 6-1 7-5 Wiltrud Probst #93 Match data
Sep 1, 1993* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lindsay Davenport #24 6-4 6-2 Wiltrud Probst #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Wiltrud Probst #794 #31 344 1,757 119 161 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Wiltrud Probst
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1986 4–5 44.4% #135 1,510 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1987 9–14 39.1% #99 1,570 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1988 13–17 43.3% #80 1,622 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1989 11–13 45.8% #90 1,651 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1990 19–14 57.6% #40 1,707 0 1
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1991 9–18 33.3% #126 1,581 0 1
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1992 16–13 55.2% #40 1,707 0 2
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1993 10–18 35.7% #105 1,611 0 2
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1994 11–14 44.0% #69 1,630 0 2
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1995 7–11 38.9% #146 1,616 0 2
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1996 1–6 14.3% #113 1,574 0 2
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1997 7–9 43.8% #84 1,620 0 2
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 1998 2–9 18.2% #194 1,569 0 2
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —