H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Yayuk Basuki H2H: 4-2

Lindsay Davenport holds a 4–2 lead over Yayuk Basuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1997 Manhattan Beach fourth round 6-1 6-1.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 2
6 main draw meetings
INA Age 55 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 1997* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 6-1 6-1 Yayuk Basuki #21 Match data
Jun 22, 1996* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Yayuk Basuki #25 6-2 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #8 Match data
Jun 2, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Lindsay Davenport #12 6-3 6-2 Yayuk Basuki #28 Match data
Aug 12, 1995* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Yayuk Basuki #34 6-4 1-6 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #9 Match data
Mar 20, 1995* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #6 6-4 6-3 Yayuk Basuki #26 Match data
Sep 2, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lindsay Davenport #209 6-4 6-4 Yayuk Basuki #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Yayuk Basuki #262 #19 1,360 1,940 161 123 56.7% 0 1 0 0 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Yayuk Basuki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1991 17–11 60.7% #35 1,678 0 1
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1992 16–14 53.3% #48 1,700 0 2
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1993 21–15 58.3% #43 1,723 0 4
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1994 23–12 65.7% #29 1,788 0 6
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1995 18–12 60.0% #24 1,846 0 6
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1996 22–16 57.9% #30 1,853 0 6
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1997 30–22 57.7% #20 1,854 0 6
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1998 11–16 40.7% #56 1,727 0 6
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1999 0–1 0.0% #241 1,707 0 6
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2000 3–4 42.9% #256 1,660 0 6
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54