H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-2

Zina Garrison holds a 2–0 lead over Lindsay Davenport in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1995 US Open second round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 31, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Zina Garrison #33 6-1 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #9 Match data
Aug 13, 1993* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Zina Garrison #16 6-3 7-6 Lindsay Davenport #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15