H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lindsay Lee-Waters vs Annabel Ellwood H2H: 1-0

Lindsay Lee-Waters holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Ellwood in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Lee-Waters leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Lee-Waters won the 1995 British Clay Court Champs round of 32 4-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Lee-Waters
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Annabel Ellwood
AUS Age 48 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lindsay Lee-Waters #167 4-6 6-2 6-2 Annabel Ellwood #170 Match data May 18, 1995* R32 British Clay Court Champs Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lindsay Lee-Waters #1,000 #33 474 1,690 36 65 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annabel Ellwood #1,021 #57 398 1,573 18 54 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Lee-Waters Annabel Ellwood
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1995 4–6 40.0% #129 1,523 0 0
18 1995 13–11 54.2% #47 1,683 0 0 1996 2–9 18.2% #105 1,472 0 0
19 1996 6–16 27.3% #107 1,576 0 0 1997 8–19 29.6% #99 1,425 0 0
20 1997 3–6 33.3% #135 1,550 0 0 1998 3–5 37.5% #138 1,456 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1999 0–5 0.0% #105 1,405 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2000 0–4 0.0% #210 1,384 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2001 1–5 16.7% #169 1,360 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #1021 1,351 0 0
26 2003 0–6 0.0% #116 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2004 9–16 36.0% #89 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2005 5–10 33.3% #138 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lindsay Lee-Waters Annabel Ellwood
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1995 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1996 4 10 14 28.6% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 8 11 19 42.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1997 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 24 45 69 34.8% 6 12 18 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — 18 41 59 30.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lindsay Lee-Waters Annabel Ellwood
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1524 110.9 — — — — +44 — — 40.9% -0.91 1–1 0–1 — -0.07
18 1995 1684 134.4 — — — — -22 -64 -120 50.0% +0.08 8–4 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.80 1996 1473 113.7 — — — — +46 — — 24.0% -1.20 1–2 (33%) — — +0.16
19 1996 1576 122.3 — — — — +21 +2 — 35.2% -1.28 3–7 (30%) 2–1 (67%) 97.4 -0.35 1997 1425 111.7 — — — — +94 +51 — 37.5% -0.77 2–8 (20%) 2–5 (29%) 91.2 +1.48
20 1997 1551 107.4 — — — — +11 — — 35.0% -0.85 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.43 1998 1457 109.8 — — — — +67 — — 36.8% -1.16 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.20
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1405 95.7 — — — — +55 — — 16.7% -2.42 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1384 104.5 — — — — +60 — — 20.0% -2.30 0–2 — — -0.31
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1361 97.4 — — — — +42 — — 37.5% -0.87 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — +0.43
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1352 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
26 2003 1485 104.9 -1.20 -1.21 0.845 46.2% — — — 20.0% -1.67 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1498 118.7 +0.58 -1.44 0.869 47.8% +27 — — 41.4% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1482 108.1 -0.10 -1.65 0.847 46.7% +37 — — 35.3% -1.18 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.6 +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1691 124.5 -0.04 -1.46 0.856 47.1% +16 -28 -120 39.4% -0.81 16–23 (41%) 10–12 (45%) 99.4 -0.50 — 1573 111.0 — — — — +66 +51 — 32.9% -1.15 6–20 (23%) 2–10 (17%) 85.0 +3.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.