H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lindsay Lee-Waters vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 1-1
Lindsay Lee-Waters and Julie Halard-Decugis are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Lee-Waters leads 1–0 on carpet, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1996 Roland Garros first round 2-6 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Julie Halard-Decugis | 2-6 6-1 6-0 | Lindsay Lee-Waters | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Lindsay Lee-Waters | 6-2 6-1 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Lee-Waters | #1,000 | #33 | 474 | 1,691 | 36 | 65 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Lee-Waters | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2004 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #89 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |