H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lindsay Lee-Waters vs Nancy Feber H2H: 1-0

Lindsay Lee-Waters holds a 1–0 lead over Nancy Feber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Lee-Waters leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Lee-Waters won the 1996 Indian Wells Open round of 64 4-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Lee-Waters
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nancy Feber
BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lindsay Lee-Waters #49 4-6 6-3 7-5 Nancy Feber #91 Match data Mar 13, 1996* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lindsay Lee-Waters #1,000 #33 474 1,690 36 65 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nancy Feber #589 #79 219 1,566 25 47 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Lee-Waters Nancy Feber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1992 1–1 50.0% #165 1,502 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1993 3–9 25.0% #152 1,486 0 0
18 1995 13–11 54.2% #47 1,683 0 0 1994 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
19 1996 6–16 27.3% #107 1,576 0 0 1995 9–12 42.9% #101 1,549 0 0
20 1997 3–6 33.3% #135 1,550 0 0 1996 6–12 33.3% #109 1,513 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1997 2–4 33.3% #177 1,516 0 0
26 2003 0–6 0.0% #116 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2004 9–16 36.0% #89 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2005 5–10 33.3% #138 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lindsay Lee-Waters Nancy Feber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1995 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1996 4 10 14 28.6% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1997 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 24 45 69 34.8% 6 12 18 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — 10 24 34 29.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lindsay Lee-Waters Nancy Feber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.25
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1487 111.8 — — — — +51 — — 26.9% -1.54 1–1 — — -0.06
18 1995 1684 134.4 — — — — -22 -64 -120 50.0% +0.08 8–4 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.80 1994 1483 105.3 — — — — -15 — +102 36.7% -0.73 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.24
19 1996 1576 122.3 — — — — +21 +2 — 35.2% -1.28 3–7 (30%) 2–1 (67%) 97.4 -0.35 1995 1550 117.2 — — — — -78 — +71 45.8% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +0.43
20 1997 1551 107.4 — — — — +11 — — 35.0% -0.85 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.43 1996 1513 113.7 — — — — -89 — +173 45.5% -0.27 0–8 (0%) 4–0 (100%) 95.3 +1.75
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1516 106.1 — — — — -48 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.12
26 2003 1485 104.9 -1.20 -1.21 0.845 46.2% — — — 20.0% -1.67 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1498 118.7 +0.58 -1.44 0.869 47.8% +27 — — 41.4% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1482 108.1 -0.10 -1.65 0.847 46.7% +37 — — 35.3% -1.18 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.6 +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1691 124.5 -0.04 -1.46 0.856 47.1% +16 -28 -120 39.4% -0.81 16–23 (41%) 10–12 (45%) 99.4 -0.50 — 1567 115.2 — — — — -40 — +114 40.7% -0.55 4–16 (20%) 7–4 (64%) 94.3 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.