H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Lindsay Lee-Waters and Sandra Cacic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Lee-Waters leads 1–0 on clay, while Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Lee-Waters won the 1996 Italian Open round of 64 1-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Lee-Waters | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | Sandra Cacic | Match data | May 8, 1996* | R64 | Italian Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Sandra Cacic | 6-4 6-1 | Lindsay Lee-Waters | Match data | Feb 23, 1996* | R32 | Oklahoma | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Lee-Waters | #1,000 | #33 | 474 | 1,690 | 36 | 65 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Lee-Waters | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #89 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lindsay Lee-Waters | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1993 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1996 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 20 | 1997 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2004 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 24 | 45 | 69 | 34.8% | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | 38 | 48 | 86 | 44.2% | 10 | 31 | 41 | 24.4% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lindsay Lee-Waters | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1482 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.22 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1684 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -64 | -120 | 50.0% | +0.08 | 8–4 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.80 | 1993 | 1534 | 121.2 | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | — | 36.0% | -0.92 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1576 | 122.3 | — | — | — | — | +21 | +2 | — | 35.2% | -1.28 | 3–7 (30%) | 2–1 (67%) | 97.4 | -0.35 | 1994 | 1617 | 134.8 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -51 | — | 43.9% | -0.56 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | 103.5 | -0.15 |
| 20 | 1997 | 1551 | 107.4 | — | — | — | — | +11 | — | — | 35.0% | -0.85 | 1–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.43 | 1995 | 1602 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -68 | — | 40.9% | -0.23 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.03 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1569 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | +101 | -123 | — | 43.5% | -0.54 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.01 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1582 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +81 | — | +18 | 43.6% | -0.62 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | 96.6 | -0.41 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1556 | 129.8 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -109 | — | 35.2% | -1.04 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.6 | -0.12 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1509 | 93.4 | — | — | — | — | +60 | -82 | — | 23.5% | -2.18 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.42 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1505 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.19 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1485 | 104.9 | -1.20 | -1.21 | 0.845 | 46.2% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.67 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.08 | 2001 | 1578 | 126.4 | — | — | — | — | +38 | -178 | — | 41.3% | -0.54 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.74 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1498 | 118.7 | +0.58 | -1.44 | 0.869 | 47.8% | +27 | — | — | 41.4% | -0.83 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 96.9 | +0.13 | 2002 | 1565 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.02 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1482 | 108.1 | -0.10 | -1.65 | 0.847 | 46.7% | +37 | — | — | 35.3% | -1.18 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.6 | +0.16 | 2003 | 1548 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 28.6% | -0.57 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.14 |
| Career | — | 1691 | 124.5 | -0.04 | -1.46 | 0.856 | 47.1% | +16 | -28 | -120 | 39.4% | -0.81 | 16–23 (41%) | 10–12 (45%) | 99.4 | -0.50 | — | 1731 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +50 | -93 | +18 | 39.1% | -0.75 | 23–23 (50%) | 14–17 (45%) | 102.9 | -0.59 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 30, 2004 | H2H |
| Lisa Raymond | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 21, 2004 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 14, 1996 | H2H |
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 24, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 2, 2001 | H2H |
| Amy Frazier | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 22, 2001 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 22, 2000 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 19, 1998 | H2H |
| Barbara Paulus | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 15, 1998 | H2H |