H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lindsay Lee-Waters vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 1-1
Lindsay Lee-Waters and Sandra Cacic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Lee-Waters leads 1–0 on clay, while Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Lee-Waters won the 1996 Rome second round 1-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1996* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Lindsay Lee-Waters | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | Sandra Cacic | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1996* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sandra Cacic | 6-4 6-1 | Lindsay Lee-Waters | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Lee-Waters | #1,000 | #33 | 474 | 1,691 | 36 | 65 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Lee-Waters | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #89 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |