H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lindsey Beaven vs Ann Kiyomura Hayashi H2H: 1-2
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi holds a 2–1 lead over Lindsey Beaven in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ann Kiyomura Hayashi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lindsey Beaven won the 1977 US Open first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 76
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 70
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1977* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Lindsey Beaven | 6-4 6-2 | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1974* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | 7-6 6-3 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1973* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | 6-1 6-3 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | — | — | — | 1,924 | 182 | 200 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsey Beaven | Ann Kiyomura Hayashi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 28–30 | 48.3% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 2 |