H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Lindsey Beaven vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 0-2

Betsy Nagelsen holds a 2–0 lead over Lindsey Beaven in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1975 Mission Viejo round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsey Beaven
GBR Age 76 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 70 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Betsy Nagelsen 6-2 6-3 Lindsey Beaven Match data Oct 1, 1975* R64 Mission Viejo WTA 250 Hard
Betsy Nagelsen 4-6 6-3 6-3 Lindsey Beaven Match data Jun 13, 1974* R32 Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lindsey Beaven — — — 1,738 119 132 47.4% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Betsy Nagelsen — #25 28 1,892 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsey Beaven Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3
18 1968 0–3 0.0% — 1,474 0 0 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3
19 1969 6–8 42.9% — 1,492 0 0 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,707 0 3
20 1970 12–15 44.4% — 1,545 0 0 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3
21 1971 17–13 56.7% — 1,591 0 1 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,657 0 3
22 1972 5–11 31.2% — 1,568 0 2 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5
23 1973 29–20 59.2% — 1,622 0 4 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,755 0 5
24 1974 15–21 41.7% — 1,547 0 5 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,808 0 6
25 1975 24–22 52.2% — 1,593 0 6 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,706 0 6
26 1976 6–10 37.5% — 1,568 0 7 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,693 0 6
27 1977 5–8 38.5% — 1,574 0 8 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,631 0 6
28 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,563 0 8 1985 14–12 53.8% — 1,714 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,646 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1991 0–2 0.0% — 1,608 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 1993 0–4 0.0% — 1,511 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,509 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lindsey Beaven Betsy Nagelsen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1968 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1969 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1970 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1971 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
22 1972 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 21 7 28 75.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3%
24 1974 — — — — 13 11 24 54.2% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1975 0 3 3 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
26 1976 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6%
27 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — —
28 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 5 10 15 33.3% 63 49 112 56.2% 35 43 78 44.9% 13 24 37 35.1% — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lindsey Beaven Betsy Nagelsen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.54
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.49
18 1968 1474 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.67 — — — -0.49 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.24
19 1969 1493 103.2 — — — — — -25 +32 43.3% -0.40 1–3 (25%) — — -0.38 1976 1708 124.4 — — — — -64 -115 +73 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.59
20 1970 1546 116.9 — — — — -18 -67 +32 44.1% -0.27 3–2 (60%) — — +2.08 1977 1678 124.1 — — — — -30 -106 +48 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.11
21 1971 1592 113.3 — — — — +17 -43 +23 54.3% +0.19 6–6 (50%) — — +5.42 1978 1658 129.7 — — — — -102 -84 +101 41.2% -0.57 4–11 (27%) 3–7 (30%) 91.9 -1.33
22 1972 1569 122.1 — — — — -31 — +57 38.9% -0.50 0–4 (0%) — — +0.35 1979 1695 123.1 — — — — -131 — +13 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.74
23 1973 1622 124.5 — — — — -107 +162 -45 57.1% +0.63 8–8 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +5.15 1980 1756 131.7 — — — — -144 — +38 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -2.08
24 1974 1548 116.1 — — — — — +112 -42 44.7% -0.34 5–8 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 95.5 +1.98 1981 1809 135.3 — — — — -128 -307 +95 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.62
25 1975 1594 124.0 — — — — -43 +64 +45 53.3% +0.47 5–8 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +2.46 1982 1706 123.4 — — — — -98 -215 +169 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 +0.16
26 1976 1568 105.8 — — — — -1 +18 — 43.6% -0.39 2–5 (29%) 1–1 — +3.41 1983 1693 127.0 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.86
27 1977 1575 108.6 — — — — -86 +87 — 40.6% -0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — +1.79 1984 1632 126.6 — — — — +58 -142 +116 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.78
28 1978 1563 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.05 1985 1714 129.7 — — — — -25 — +88 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.14
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1700 131.2 — — — — -55 — +170 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.52
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1646 121.7 — — — — -24 — +150 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.59
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -26 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1663 126.1 — — — — -56 — +97 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.46
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1640 115.1 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -50 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16
Career — 1739 120.7 — — — — -32 +70 +10 48.4% -0.01 33–47 (41%) 9–8 (53%) 94.2 +8.73 — 1893 132.2 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–129 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.0 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.