H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lindsey Beaven vs Joyce Williams H2H: 0-3
Joyce Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Lindsey Beaven in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Joyce Williams leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Joyce Williams won the 1970 Fulham third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 76
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Age 81
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1970* | Fulham | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Joyce Williams | 6-1 6-1 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1970* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Joyce Williams | 6-0 8-6 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1970* | Stalybridge | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Joyce Williams | 6-2 6-1 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Joyce Williams | — | — | — | 1,966 | 188 | 88 | 68.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsey Beaven | Joyce Williams | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 35–20 | 63.6% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 46–17 | 73.0% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 23–12 | 65.7% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 30–8 | 78.9% | — | 1,935 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,842 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,835 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 11 |