H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lindsey Beaven vs Julie Heldman H2H: 0-3
Julie Heldman holds a 3–0 lead over Lindsey Beaven in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julie Heldman leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julie Heldman won the 1974 Cardiff fourth round 6-1 2-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 76
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1974* | Cardiff | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Julie Heldman | 6-1 2-6 6-0 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| Sep 30, 1972* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Heldman | 6-2 6-3 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| Jun 17, 1970* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Julie Heldman | 6-0 6-4 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Julie Heldman | — | — | — | 2,133 | 381 | 159 | 70.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsey Beaven | Julie Heldman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 53–15 | 77.9% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 74–17 | 81.3% | — | 2,020 | 0 | 14 |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 29–12 | 70.7% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 32–26 | 55.2% | — | 1,958 | 0 | 16 |
| 27 | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 68–31 | 68.7% | — | 2,066 | 0 | 19 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 60–21 | 74.1% | — | 2,086 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 24–14 | 63.2% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 21 |