H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lindsey Beaven vs Marcie Louie H2H: 0-1
Marcie Louie holds a 1–0 lead over Lindsey Beaven in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcie Louie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcie Louie won the 1976 Eastbourne second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 76
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 72
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1976* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Marcie Louie | 6-3 6-3 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsey Beaven | Marcie Louie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |