H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Lindsey Beaven vs Michelle Tyler H2H: 1-0
Lindsey Beaven holds a 1–0 lead over Michelle Tyler in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsey Beaven leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsey Beaven won the 1976 Bournemouth Indoors final 0-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 76
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 68
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1976* | Bournemouth Indoors | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Lindsey Beaven | 0-6 7-5 6-4 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Michelle Tyler | — | — | — | 1,893 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsey Beaven | Michelle Tyler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |