H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lindsey Beaven vs Patricia Cody H2H: 0-1
Patricia Cody holds a 1–0 lead over Lindsey Beaven in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Cody leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Cody won the 1970 Guildford third round 8-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1970* | Guildford | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Patricia Cody | 8-6 6-3 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Patricia Cody | — | — | — | 1,563 | 24 | 47 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsey Beaven | Patricia Cody | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |