H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lindsey Beaven vs Rosemary Pearson H2H: 2-1
Lindsey Beaven holds a 2–1 lead over Rosemary Pearson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Lindsey Beaven leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lindsey Beaven won the 1974 Hampstead fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 76
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1974* | Hampstead | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lindsey Beaven | 6-3 6-2 | Rosemary Pearson | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1973* | Hampstead | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Rosemary Pearson | 6-4 6-3 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1972* | Frinton-On-Sea | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Lindsey Beaven | 6-4 6-4 | Rosemary Pearson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Rosemary Pearson | — | — | — | 1,521 | 12 | 20 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lindsey Beaven | Rosemary Pearson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |