H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lindsey Beaven vs Veronica Burton H2H: 1-3
Veronica Burton holds a 3–1 lead over Lindsey Beaven in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Veronica Burton leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Veronica Burton won the 1973 Indianapolis semifinal 4-6 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 76
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 74
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1973* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Veronica Burton | 4-6 7-5 6-0 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| May 6, 1973* | Sutton | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Lindsey Beaven | 1-6 6-4 7-6 | Veronica Burton | Match data |
| Apr 28, 1973* | Norwich | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Veronica Burton | 6-1 6-3 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Veronica Burton | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Veronica Burton | — | — | — | 1,832 | 139 | 131 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsey Beaven | Veronica Burton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 39–20 | 66.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 3 |