H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lisa Bonder Kreiss vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 1-0

Lisa Bonder Kreiss holds a 1–0 lead over Debbie Spence Nasim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lisa Bonder Kreiss leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lisa Bonder Kreiss won the 1984 US Open round of 64 5-7 7-5 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lisa Bonder Kreiss 5-7 7-5 6-3 Debbie Spence Nasim Match data Aug 31, 1984* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lisa Bonder Kreiss 1,928 148 131 53.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Debbie Spence Nasim 1,827 56 62 47.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Lisa Bonder Kreiss Debbie Spence Nasim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1981 9–6 60.0% 1,603 0 1 1983 4–2 66.7% 1,565 0 0
1982 28–15 65.1% 1,767 0 3 1984 9–7 56.2% 1,649 0 1
1983 26–19 57.8% 1,884 0 5 1985 25–19 56.8% 1,777 0 1
1984 31–19 62.0% 1,865 0 5 1986 13–22 37.1% 1,619 0 1
1985 17–22 43.6% 1,796 0 5 1987 4–11 26.7% 1,554 0 1
1986 12–13 48.0% 1,733 0 5 1989 1–1 50.0% 1,557 0 1
1987 12–14 46.2% 1,703 0 5
1988 6–14 30.0% 1,634 0 5
1989 1–2 33.3% 1,626 0 5
1990 1–2 33.3% 1,620 0 5
1991 5–5 50.0% 1,637 0 5

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Lisa Bonder Kreiss Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1981 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 4 2 6 66.7%
1982 9 3 12 75.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1984 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1983 8 2 10 80.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 1985 8 8 16 50.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
1984 7 3 10 70.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1987 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1986 5 5 10 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0%
1987 8 5 13 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
1988 5 10 15 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1989 1 2 3 33.3%
1990 1 2 3 33.3%
1991 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 55 44 99 55.6% 51 37 88 58.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 26 35 61 42.6% Career 26 27 53 49.1% 25 20 45 55.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 11 16 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Lisa Bonder Kreiss Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1981 1604 125.7 -14 58.1% +0.77 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.3 +0.03 1983 1565 107.6 +78 61.5% +0.38 1–0 2–0 +0.32
1982 1768 139.5 -114 +66 61.1% +0.97 9–2 (82%) 3–4 (43%) 108.6 -1.22 1984 1649 120.5 +26 -52 55.0% +0.22 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.8 +0.47
1983 1885 141.7 +6 -143 -283 55.0% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 +1.89 1985 1777 141.5 -50 -20 54.7% +0.34 7–4 (64%) 3–6 (33%) 103.0 -1.69
1984 1865 149.0 -23 +31 -235 60.9% +0.95 7–8 (47%) 3–6 (33%) 96.1 +1.70 1986 1619 116.9 -1 +131 -90 35.5% -1.12 5–1 (83%) 3–3 (50%) 105.9 +0.57
1985 1796 146.1 +42 +45 -193 41.9% -0.55 10–7 (59%) 3–6 (33%) 101.4 -1.92 1987 1555 115.2 +10 +132 29.0% -1.77 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) -0.23
1986 1733 125.3 +15 +70 54.5% +0.16 3–6 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 96.8 +0.52 1989 1558 101.4 66.7% +2.33 1–0 0–1 +0.20
1987 1704 131.7 +25 +55 -107 48.2% -0.21 1–3 (25%) 0–2 -0.88
1988 1634 129.9 +23 +65 34.8% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 0–1 -1.54
1989 1626 98.2 +2 37.5% -1.38 1–1 +0.16
1990 1621 109.4 +3 42.9% -0.71 0–1 0–1 -0.21
1991 1638 118.4 +9 50.0% -0.10 1–0 +0.13
Career 1928 145.1 0 +15 -216 52.6% +0.24 41–40 (51%) 21–24 (47%) 99.3 -0.48 Career 1827 129.7 -4 +41 -90 46.5% -0.34 20–10 (67%) 12–13 (48%) 107.8 -0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.