H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lisa Bonder Kreiss vs Michelle Torres H2H: 2-3
Michelle Torres holds a 3–2 lead over Lisa Bonder Kreiss in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Michelle Torres leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Michelle Torres won the 1986 Tampa third round 4-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 1986* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Michelle Torres | 4-1 (ret.) | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1986* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 7-6 6-1 | Michelle Torres | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1984* | Fort Lauderdale | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Michelle Torres | 6-4 7-6 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1984* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-2 7-5 | Michelle Torres | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1983* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Michelle Torres | 6-4 6-2 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | — | — | — | 1,928 | 148 | 131 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Michelle Torres | #298 | #18 | 18 | 1,846 | 93 | 111 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Michelle Torres | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 15–11 | 57.7% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #20 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #21 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #92 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #277 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |