H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lisa Bonder Kreiss vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 2-0
Lisa Bonder Kreiss holds a 2–0 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lisa Bonder Kreiss leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lisa Bonder Kreiss won the 1988 San Diego third round 6-0 3-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 1988* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-0 3-6 6-0 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-1 7-5 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | — | — | — | 1,928 | 148 | 131 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 1983 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 1987 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 1991 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |