Lisa Oneill
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maureen Drake | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 13, 1988 | H2H |
| Anne Minter | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 15, 1988 | H2H |
| Donna Faber | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Belinda Cordwell | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 2, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Lisa Oneill vs Barbara Paulus H2H: 0-1
Barbara Paulus holds a 1–0 lead over Lisa Oneill in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Paulus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Paulus won the 1989 Hamburg Open round of 64 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Paulus | 6-0 6-1 | Lisa Oneill | Match data | May 3, 1989* | R64 | Hamburg Open | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Oneill | — | — | — | 1,500 | 11 | 26 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barbara Paulus | #347 | #10 | 1,696 | 1,957 | 232 | 140 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lisa Oneill | Barbara Paulus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #165 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #27 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,410 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #15 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #108 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #23 | 1,798 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #45 | 1,751 | 0 | 6 |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Lisa Oneill | Barbara Paulus | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1985 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1987 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1988 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1989 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 1990 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 22 | 6 | 28 | 78.6% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Career | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | Career | 75 | 55 | 130 | 57.7% | 120 | 56 | 176 | 68.2% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 35 | 23 | 58 | 60.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Lisa Oneill | Barbara Paulus | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1985 | 1470 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.16 | 1986 | 1529 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +50 | — | 52.9% | -0.47 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–0 | — | +0.85 |
| 1986 | 1484 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | — | — | +0.60 | 1987 | 1594 | 117.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +61 | — | 52.2% | -0.02 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +2.31 |
| 1987 | 1460 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | +87 | — | — | 31.3% | -0.81 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.95 | 1988 | 1756 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -127 | +35 | — | 61.1% | +0.69 | 6–2 (75%) | 5–2 (71%) | 107.4 | +1.41 |
| 1988 | 1410 | 93.8 | — | — | — | — | +74 | +45 | +120 | 32.3% | -1.26 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–1 | — | +0.71 | 1989 | 1835 | 142.7 | — | — | — | — | -98 | +11 | — | 58.0% | +0.71 | 15–5 (75%) | 1–5 (17%) | 103.7 | -1.53 |
| 1989 | 1417 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | +67 | — | — | 38.5% | -1.77 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.60 | 1990 | 1896 | 143.9 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +25 | — | 63.7% | +0.76 | 13–8 (62%) | 5–3 (63%) | 103.5 | +1.16 |
| 1990 | 1426 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +63 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.56 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.07 | 1991 | 1846 | 140.0 | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 53.8% | +0.29 | 6–3 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 101.6 | -1.04 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1720 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | +20 | +127 | — | 37.0% | -1.19 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.05 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1660 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | +3 | — | — | 31.8% | -0.82 | 1–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.39 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1799 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | -17 | +64 | — | 67.2% | +1.11 | 7–1 (88%) | 4–0 (100%) | 110.4 | +2.57 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1869 | 151.5 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +97 | — | 67.2% | +1.23 | 9–12 (43%) | 3–3 (50%) | 94.9 | +0.39 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1878 | 149.1 | — | — | — | — | -57 | +105 | — | 64.8% | +1.27 | 9–6 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.4 | +3.06 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1751 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +129 | — | 46.3% | -0.34 | 7–5 (58%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.4 | -0.80 |
| Career | 1500 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | +72 | +45 | +120 | 36.8% | -0.99 | 3–10 (23%) | 1–3 (25%) | 92.0 | +8.35 | Career | 1958 | 145.3 | — | — | — | — | -35 | +69 | — | 58.7% | +0.60 | 78–50 (61%) | 34–26 (57%) | 105.4 | +2.18 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Barbara Paulus
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conchita Martínez | 2 | 4 | 6 | Nov 3, 1996 | H2H |
| Judith Wiesner | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 3, 1996 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 6 | 6 | Apr 7, 1996 | H2H |
| Alexandra Fusai | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 27, 1998 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 21, 1998 | H2H |