Lisa Oneill
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maureen Drake | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 13, 1988 | H2H |
| Anne Minter | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 15, 1988 | H2H |
| Donna Faber | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Belinda Cordwell | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 2, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Donna Faber holds a 1–0 lead over Lisa Oneill in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1990 Wellington round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Lisa Oneill | Match data | Feb 8, 1990* | R32 | Wellington | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Oneill | — | — | — | 1,500 | 11 | 26 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lisa Oneill | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,410 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Lisa Oneill | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1985 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1988 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1989 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1990 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | Career | 42 | 53 | 95 | 44.2% | 19 | 29 | 48 | 39.6% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Lisa Oneill | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1985 | 1470 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.16 | 1987 | 1496 | 103.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.17 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 1986 | 1484 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | — | — | +0.60 | 1988 | 1532 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +14 | — | 40.6% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 1987 | 1460 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | +87 | — | — | 31.3% | -0.81 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.95 | 1989 | 1675 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | +40 | -169 | -99 | 48.9% | +0.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.4 | +1.23 |
| 1988 | 1410 | 93.8 | — | — | — | — | +74 | +45 | +120 | 32.3% | -1.26 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–1 | — | +0.71 | 1990 | 1631 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -19 | -43 | 43.1% | -0.68 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.90 |
| 1989 | 1417 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | +67 | — | — | 38.5% | -1.77 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.60 | 1991 | 1593 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +38 | +10 | 41.3% | -0.77 | 9–3 (75%) | 4–5 (44%) | 106.2 | +1.62 |
| 1990 | 1426 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +63 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.56 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.07 | 1992 | 1542 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +37 | — | 38.0% | -0.77 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.6 | +0.56 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1432 | 94.2 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.12 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.5 | +0.77 |
| Career | 1500 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | +72 | +45 | +120 | 36.8% | -0.99 | 3–10 (23%) | 1–3 (25%) | 92.0 | +8.35 | Career | 1719 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -11 | -44 | 41.2% | -0.60 | 26–20 (57%) | 13–17 (43%) | 103.5 | +3.33 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maureen Drake | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 13, 1988 | H2H |
| Anne Minter | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 15, 1988 | H2H |
| Donna Faber | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Belinda Cordwell | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 2, 1990 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Maleeva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 20, 1991 | H2H |
| Angelica Gavaldon | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Jenny Byrne | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 28, 1992 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 24, 1992 | H2H |