H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 4-10
Amanda Coetzer holds a 10–4 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 7–2 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2003 Indian Wells third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4
–
10
14 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-0 6-3 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2003* | Memphis | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-3 6-2 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2002* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Amanda Coetzer | 7-5 6-4 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2001* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Lisa Raymond | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2000* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2000* | Oklahoma | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Amanda Coetzer | 2-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2000* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 7-6(1) 6-0 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1999* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Lisa Raymond | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1999* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-7 6-1 6-1 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1999* | Stanford | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1998* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Amanda Coetzer | 6-4 6-1 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Oct 16, 1997* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 7-5 6-3 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-4 6-1 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1993* | Tokyo Nichirei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-2 6-4 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Amanda Coetzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |