H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Lisa Raymond vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 4-10

Amanda Coetzer holds a 10–4 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 7–2 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2003 Indian Wells Open round of 32 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lisa Raymond
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 10
14 main draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Coetzer #19 6-0 6-3 Lisa Raymond #23 Match data Mar 5, 2003 R32 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lisa Raymond #21 6-3 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #23 Match data Feb 23, 2003* F Memphis Classic Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #19 7-5 6-4 Lisa Raymond #21 Match data Jan 31, 2002* R32 Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Lisa Raymond #30 7-5 3-6 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #13 Match data Jun 22, 2001* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Amanda Coetzer #13 4-6 7-5 6-1 Lisa Raymond #24 Match data Aug 3, 2000* R32 San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #16 2-6 6-4 7-6(4) Lisa Raymond #29 Match data Feb 26, 2000* QF Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Amanda Coetzer #10 7-6(1) 6-0 Lisa Raymond #29 Match data Jan 10, 2000* R32 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lisa Raymond #30 4-6 7-5 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #10 Match data Nov 11, 1999* R32 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Amanda Coetzer #9 6-7 6-1 6-1 Lisa Raymond #28 Match data Aug 5, 1999* R32 San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #9 4-6 6-2 7-5 Lisa Raymond #29 Match data Jul 30, 1999* R16 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #4 6-4 6-1 Lisa Raymond #19 Match data Apr 4, 1998* SF Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Lisa Raymond #19 7-5 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #5 Match data Oct 16, 1997* R16 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #17 6-4 6-1 Lisa Raymond #50 Match data Sep 3, 1996* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Amanda Coetzer #17 6-2 6-4 Lisa Raymond #51 Match data Sep 24, 1993* R32 Tokyo Nichirei Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,946 327 273 54.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lisa Raymond Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0
18 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,618 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,692 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0
20 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0
21 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,812 0 0 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2
22 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,860 0 1 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3
23 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,913 0 1 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3
24 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,838 0 1 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3
25 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5
26 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,794 0 2 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6
27 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6
28 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7
29 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,766 0 4 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2004 20–19 51.3% #30 1,760 0 4 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8
31 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,635 0 4 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,581 0 4 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9
33 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,564 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lisa Raymond Amanda Coetzer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1991 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1995 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1997 18 11 29 62.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 1998 13 9 22 59.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1999 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
26 2000 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2002 21 14 35 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
29 2003 16 11 27 59.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 175 152 327 53.5% 45 48 93 48.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 54 37 91 59.3% — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 46/141 of Lisa Raymond's and 7/51 of Amanda Coetzer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lisa Raymond Amanda Coetzer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
29 2003 7/43 2.3 4.4 53.2% 63.4% 51.5% 58.8% 57.5% 58.1% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 12/39 4.1 2.8 61.4% 68.5% 46.6% 49.6% 48.7% 60.2% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 5/33 2.6 4.8 66.3% 51.2% 37.5% 51.9% 31.4% 45.8% 42.4% 2003 5/46 0.6 2.6 67.1% 60.3% 44.8% 58.0% 41.1% 55.6% 43.5%
32 2006 21/25 3.0 3.9 60.0% 64.2% 46.0% 46.7% 44.4% 56.8% 37.8% 2004 2/5 0.0 1.0 71.5% 51.7% 48.7% 53.3% 75.0% 50.9% 54.3%
33 2007 1/1 2.0 4.0 58.8% 68.1% 27.3% 55.6% 50.0% 51.3% 29.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 46/600 3.1 3.8 60.0% 63.9% 45.7% 50.1% 46.2% 56.6% 40.8% — 7/807 0.4 2.1 68.3% 57.8% 45.9% 56.7% 50.8% 54.2% 46.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lisa Raymond Amanda Coetzer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1497 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21
17 1991 1511 107.5 — — — — +27 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 — — +0.30 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
18 1992 1618 137.7 — — — — +26 — — 51.9% +0.15 1–0 0–2 — +0.38 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) — -1.00
19 1993 1692 137.1 — — — — -34 — +15 54.4% +0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.84 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) — -1.77
20 1994 1749 138.6 — — — — -41 -122 -60 55.2% +0.24 5–10 (33%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.10 1992 1865 153.9 — — — — -32 +16 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.99
21 1995 1813 147.9 — — — — -6 — -76 56.0% +0.40 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.56 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) — +1.59
22 1996 1861 149.8 — — — — 0 -246 -26 53.3% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.87 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.72
23 1997 1913 159.1 — — — — +23 -242 -109 57.9% +0.55 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) — -0.65 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +74 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) — -2.38
24 1998 1839 147.1 — — — — +16 -55 -97 56.9% +0.45 10–10 (50%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.54 1996 1856 161.7 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.79
25 1999 1784 143.4 — — — — +11 -60 -17 49.5% +0.06 9–10 (47%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.50 1997 2014 167.3 — — — — -43 +103 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.54
26 2000 1795 141.6 — — — — -33 -118 +163 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.19 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.82
27 2001 1834 151.1 — — — — -13 -128 +181 58.1% +0.74 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) — -2.05 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) — +0.50
28 2002 1755 138.0 — — — — +6 -113 +316 54.5% +0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.97 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) — +0.42
29 2003 1766 139.9 +1.58 +1.47 1.097 52.3% +23 -87 +216 53.8% +0.08 13–7 (65%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.07 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) — +2.01
30 2004 1760 142.2 +2.54 -0.29 1.089 51.9% +66 -171 +175 48.9% +0.05 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.43 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.05
31 2005 1635 122.3 -3.26 -0.74 0.782 44.6% +87 -100 +170 43.2% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) — +2.00 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.51
32 2006 1581 121.0 +0.78 -3.50 0.877 47.3% +54 -66 +220 35.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.49 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28
33 2007 1565 98.6 -2.01 +0.33 0.601 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 150.2 +0.86 -1.52 0.940 48.9% +12 -115 +91 53.0% +0.26 113–94 (55%) 71–64 (53%) 102.4 +0.25 — 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.