H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 1-0
Lisa Raymond holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 1993 Key Biscayne first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1993* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 6-4 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |