H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lisa Raymond vs Anne Kremer H2H: 3-0

Lisa Raymond holds a 3–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lisa Raymond leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 2005 US Open first round 6-4 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lisa Raymond
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lisa Raymond #64 6-4 3-6 6-2 Anne Kremer #147 Match data Aug 31, 2005* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lisa Raymond #21 6-2 6-3 Anne Kremer #34 Match data Mar 6, 2002 R16 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lisa Raymond #28 6-7(4) 7-5 6-1 Anne Kremer #36 Match data Jun 16, 2000* R16 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,946 327 273 54.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lisa Raymond Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,618 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,692 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0
21 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,812 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0
22 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,860 0 1 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0
23 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,913 0 1 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0
24 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,838 0 1 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2
25 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,794 0 2 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2
27 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2
28 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2
29 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,766 0 4 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2
30 2004 20–19 51.3% #30 1,760 0 4 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2
31 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,635 0 4 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2
32 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,581 0 4 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2
33 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,564 0 4 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lisa Raymond Anne Kremer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1995 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1997 18 11 29 62.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 1998 13 9 22 59.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1999 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 2000 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 21 14 35 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 2003 16 11 27 59.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 175 152 327 53.5% 45 48 93 48.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 54 37 91 59.3% — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 46/141 of Lisa Raymond's and 41/71 of Anne Kremer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lisa Raymond Anne Kremer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
29 2003 7/43 2.3 4.4 53.2% 63.4% 51.5% 58.8% 57.5% 58.1% 46.0% 2005 5/18 2.4 1.6 69.3% 58.4% 35.9% 47.0% 58.1% 51.0% 43.0%
30 2004 12/39 4.1 2.8 61.4% 68.5% 46.6% 49.6% 48.7% 60.2% 43.4% 2006 5/12 0.8 3.0 62.0% 50.4% 41.6% 42.4% 30.3% 47.5% 42.1%
31 2005 5/33 2.6 4.8 66.3% 51.2% 37.5% 51.9% 31.4% 45.8% 42.4% 2007 12/20 1.3 2.7 70.8% 54.9% 43.4% 43.1% 45.8% 51.6% 42.4%
32 2006 21/25 3.0 3.9 60.0% 64.2% 46.0% 46.7% 44.4% 56.8% 37.8% 2008 9/10 1.0 3.8 62.2% 52.5% 39.7% 44.1% 42.5% 47.5% 42.9%
33 2007 1/1 2.0 4.0 58.8% 68.1% 27.3% 55.6% 50.0% 51.3% 29.3% 2009 3/4 0.7 4.7 60.9% 59.4% 32.9% 41.7% 30.0% 49.0% 36.5%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 7/7 1.7 2.6 66.0% 52.0% 38.2% 34.7% 59.6% 47.4% 38.2%
Career — 46/600 3.1 3.8 60.0% 63.9% 45.7% 50.1% 46.2% 56.6% 40.8% — 41/333 1.3 3.0 66.1% 54.1% 39.8% 42.2% 45.9% 49.2% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lisa Raymond Anne Kremer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1497 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1511 107.5 — — — — +27 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 — — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1618 137.7 — — — — +26 — — 51.9% +0.15 1–0 0–2 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1692 137.1 — — — — -34 — +15 54.4% +0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 +0.84 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09
20 1994 1749 138.6 — — — — -41 -122 -60 55.2% +0.24 5–10 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 +0.10 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12
21 1995 1813 147.9 — — — — -6 — -76 56.0% +0.40 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 107.8 +0.56 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53
22 1996 1861 149.8 — — — — 0 -246 -26 53.3% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.87 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65
23 1997 1913 159.1 — — — — +23 -242 -109 57.9% +0.55 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) 104.2 -0.65 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35
24 1998 1839 147.1 — — — — +16 -55 -97 56.9% +0.45 10–10 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 98.2 +0.54 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80
25 1999 1784 143.4 — — — — +11 -60 -17 49.5% +0.06 9–10 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 98.1 -0.50 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14
26 2000 1795 141.6 — — — — -33 -118 +163 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 -0.19 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24
27 2001 1834 151.1 — — — — -13 -128 +181 58.1% +0.74 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -2.05 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58
28 2002 1755 138.0 — — — — +6 -113 +316 54.5% +0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 +0.97 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32
29 2003 1766 139.9 +1.58 +1.47 1.097 52.3% +23 -87 +216 53.8% +0.08 13–7 (65%) 7–4 (64%) 105.7 +0.07 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09
30 2004 1760 142.2 +2.54 -0.29 1.089 51.9% +66 -171 +175 48.9% +0.05 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.43 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81
31 2005 1635 122.3 -3.26 -0.74 0.782 44.6% +87 -100 +170 43.2% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.1 +2.00 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03
32 2006 1581 121.0 +0.78 -3.50 0.877 47.3% +54 -66 +220 35.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 96.0 -0.49 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27
33 2007 1565 98.6 -2.01 +0.33 0.601 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19
Career — 1947 150.2 +0.86 -1.52 0.940 48.9% +12 -115 +91 53.0% +0.26 113–94 (55%) 71–64 (53%) 102.4 +0.25 — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.