H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-2
Asa Carlsson holds a 2–1 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Asa Carlsson leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 2000 Hilton Head second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2000* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1996* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Asa Carlsson | 6-4 6-0 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1995* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Asa Carlsson | 6-3 6-3 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lisa Raymond | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |