H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lisa Raymond vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 1-5

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 5–1 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 1996 Canadian Indoor quarterfinal 6-0 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lisa Raymond
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 26, 1996* Canadian Indoor WTA 250 QF Carpet Lisa Raymond #44 6-0 7-6 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #11 Match data
Oct 10, 1996* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #11 7-6 6-3 Lisa Raymond #44 Match data
Feb 25, 1996* Oklahoma WTA 250 QF Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #11 6-3 6-3 Lisa Raymond #28 Match data
Jan 12, 1996* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #13 6-4 6-7 6-3 Lisa Raymond #20 Match data
Oct 12, 1995* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #13 6-4 7-5 Lisa Raymond #19 Match data
Oct 6, 1995* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #14 3-6 6-3 6-2 Lisa Raymond #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,945 325 272 54.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lisa Raymond Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,617 0 0 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,691 0 0 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,813 0 0 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,859 0 1 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,910 0 1 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,837 0 1 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,795 0 2 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,767 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2004 18–18 50.0% #30 1,746 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,631 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,580 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7