H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lisa Raymond vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 3-2

Lisa Raymond holds a 3–2 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2002 US Open third round 7-6(2) 6-4.

USA Age 52 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #15 7-6(2) 6-4 Lisa Raymond #25 Match data
Jun 23, 2001* Eastbourne WTA 500 QF Grass Chanda Rubin #27 6-4 6-4 Lisa Raymond #30 Match data
May 12, 1999* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Lisa Raymond #38 6-3 7-6 Chanda Rubin #23 Match data
Jun 22, 1996* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Lisa Raymond #37 6-3 (ret.) Chanda Rubin #7 Match data
Nov 11, 1993* Philadelphia WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Lisa Raymond #46 6-4 6-0 Chanda Rubin #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,945 325 272 54.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lisa Raymond Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,617 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,691 0 0 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,813 0 0 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,859 0 1 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,910 0 1 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,837 0 1 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,795 0 2 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,767 0 4 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 2004 18–18 50.0% #30 1,746 0 4 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7
31 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,631 0 4
32 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,580 0 4
33 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,563 0 4