H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lisa Raymond vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 3-2

Lisa Raymond holds a 3–2 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2002 US Open round of 32 7-6(2) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lisa Raymond
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chanda Rubin #15 7-6(2) 6-4 Lisa Raymond #25 Match data Sep 1, 2002* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Chanda Rubin #27 6-4 6-4 Lisa Raymond #30 Match data Jun 23, 2001* QF Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Lisa Raymond #38 6-3 7-6 Chanda Rubin #23 Match data May 12, 1999* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Lisa Raymond #37 6-3 (ret.) Chanda Rubin #7 Match data Jun 22, 1996* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Lisa Raymond #46 6-4 6-0 Chanda Rubin #68 Match data Nov 11, 1993* R32 Philadelphia Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,946 327 273 54.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,042 345 232 59.8% 0 0 0 3 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lisa Raymond Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,616 0 0
17 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,618 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,692 0 0 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,934 0 0
20 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,985 0 0
21 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,812 0 0 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,813 0 1
22 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,860 0 1 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,799 0 1
23 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,913 0 1 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,839 0 2
24 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,838 0 1 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,940 0 3
25 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,816 0 3
26 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,794 0 2 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,962 0 5
27 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3 2004 18–11 62.1% #52 1,858 0 7
29 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,766 0 4 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,820 0 7
30 2004 20–19 51.3% #30 1,760 0 4 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,718 0 7
31 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,635 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,581 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,564 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lisa Raymond Chanda Rubin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
17 1991 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 17 5 22 77.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1995 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1997 8 10 18 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
22 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 1997 18 11 29 62.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1999 26 12 38 68.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1998 13 9 22 59.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2000 24 12 36 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1999 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 2000 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2002 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
27 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 27 15 42 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2002 21 14 35 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
29 2003 16 11 27 59.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 175 152 327 53.5% 45 48 93 48.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 54 37 91 59.3% — 201 135 336 59.8% 66 47 113 58.4% 36 23 59 61.0% 42 27 69 60.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 46/141 of Lisa Raymond's and 22/100 of Chanda Rubin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lisa Raymond Chanda Rubin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 9/63 2.6 3.1 60.3% 59.5% 50.1% 50.9% 48.1% 56.0% 48.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 7/29 1.0 2.9 63.3% 64.2% 47.5% 49.3% 53.5% 58.1% 48.4%
29 2003 7/43 2.3 4.4 53.2% 63.4% 51.5% 58.8% 57.5% 58.1% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 12/39 4.1 2.8 61.4% 68.5% 46.6% 49.6% 48.7% 60.2% 43.4% 2006 6/8 0.2 1.2 69.5% 55.1% 44.9% 36.1% 40.3% 51.5% 33.4%
31 2005 5/33 2.6 4.8 66.3% 51.2% 37.5% 51.9% 31.4% 45.8% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 21/25 3.0 3.9 60.0% 64.2% 46.0% 46.7% 44.4% 56.8% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 1/1 2.0 4.0 58.8% 68.1% 27.3% 55.6% 50.0% 51.3% 29.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 46/600 3.1 3.8 60.0% 63.9% 45.7% 50.1% 46.2% 56.6% 40.8% — 22/577 1.4 2.5 63.8% 59.8% 47.9% 46.4% 47.7% 55.4% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lisa Raymond Chanda Rubin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1489 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.06
15 1989 1497 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17 1991 1584 123.6 — — — — +18 — — 56.3% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.85
16 1990 1480 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23 1992 1617 121.6 — — — — +45 -100 — 40.7% -0.90 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 +0.28
17 1991 1511 107.5 — — — — +27 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 — — +0.30 1993 1653 130.3 — — — — -45 -47 +2 46.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — -0.24
18 1992 1618 137.7 — — — — +26 — — 51.9% +0.15 1–0 0–2 — +0.38 1994 1804 148.9 — — — — +16 -107 — 58.4% +0.56 10–5 (67%) 8–2 (80%) 111.5 -1.24
19 1993 1692 137.1 — — — — -34 — +15 54.4% +0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 +0.84 1995 1934 157.2 — — — — -22 -151 -210 64.6% +1.22 10–10 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 103.9 +0.03
20 1994 1749 138.6 — — — — -41 -122 -60 55.2% +0.24 5–10 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 +0.10 1996 1986 164.3 — — — — +40 — — 60.9% +0.84 9–1 (90%) 2–3 (40%) 106.7 -1.38
21 1995 1813 147.9 — — — — -6 — -76 56.0% +0.40 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 107.8 +0.56 1997 1814 153.7 — — — — +40 +33 — 53.2% +0.21 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 -2.41
22 1996 1861 149.8 — — — — 0 -246 -26 53.3% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.87 1998 1800 144.1 — — — — +21 +15 -63 49.4% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 2–4 (33%) 100.7 -0.79
23 1997 1913 159.1 — — — — +23 -242 -109 57.9% +0.55 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) 104.2 -0.65 1999 1839 156.4 — — — — +47 -68 — 62.2% +0.81 5–10 (33%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 -2.46
24 1998 1839 147.1 — — — — +16 -55 -97 56.9% +0.45 10–10 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 98.2 +0.54 2000 1941 157.5 — — — — +8 -111 -226 61.4% +0.66 14–9 (61%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 -2.47
25 1999 1784 143.4 — — — — +11 -60 -17 49.5% +0.06 9–10 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 98.1 -0.50 2001 1816 133.7 — — — — +33 -63 -24 52.2% +0.17 5–4 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.0 -0.54
26 2000 1795 141.6 — — — — -33 -118 +163 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 -0.19 2002 1962 162.2 — — — — -46 -101 +11 68.5% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 -3.02
27 2001 1834 151.1 — — — — -13 -128 +181 58.1% +0.74 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -2.05 2003 1918 157.5 +1.04 +3.08 1.104 51.9% -9 +11 +142 62.9% +0.85 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 -0.62
28 2002 1755 138.0 — — — — +6 -113 +316 54.5% +0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 +0.97 2004 1858 136.0 +2.06 +2.08 1.157 53.1% +22 — — 58.7% +0.65 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 96.4 +0.02
29 2003 1766 139.9 +1.58 +1.47 1.097 52.3% +23 -87 +216 53.8% +0.08 13–7 (65%) 7–4 (64%) 105.7 +0.07 2005 1821 106.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.30
30 2004 1760 142.2 +2.54 -0.29 1.089 51.9% +66 -171 +175 48.9% +0.05 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.43 2006 1719 114.3 -0.94 -3.06 0.688 42.2% +24 — — 12.5% -2.75 — — — -0.69
31 2005 1635 122.3 -3.26 -0.74 0.782 44.6% +87 -100 +170 43.2% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.1 +2.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 1581 121.0 +0.78 -3.50 0.877 47.3% +54 -66 +220 35.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 96.0 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 1565 98.6 -2.01 +0.33 0.601 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 150.2 +0.86 -1.52 0.940 48.9% +12 -115 +91 53.0% +0.26 113–94 (55%) 71–64 (53%) 102.4 +0.25 — 2043 157.5 +0.82 +1.09 0.996 49.6% +13 -69 -49 57.4% +0.52 103–69 (60%) 62–47 (57%) 110.6 -2.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.