H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 5-9
Conchita Martínez holds a 9–5 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 5–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 2–2 on grass. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2004 Eastbourne third round 3-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5
–
9
14 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2004* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Conchita Martínez | 3-6 6-2 6-0 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2004* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-4 7-5 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2002* | Waikoloa | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Lisa Raymond | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Lisa Raymond | 6-3 6-1 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1998* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
| Sep 6, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Apr 11, 1998* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Conchita Martínez | 6-4 7-5 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jul 31, 1997* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Nov 15, 1996* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Lisa Raymond | 6-2 6-3 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Conchita Martínez | 7-5 7-5 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1995* | San Diego | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-2 6-0 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1994* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-0 3-6 6-1 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1993* | Philadelphia | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Conchita Martínez | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Conchita Martínez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 |