H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Dally Randriantefy H2H: 0-1
Dally Randriantefy holds a 1–0 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dally Randriantefy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dally Randriantefy won the 2004 Charleston second round 7-5 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MAD
Age 49
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2004* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Dally Randriantefy | 7-5 2-6 6-2 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Dally Randriantefy | #99 | #44 | 721 | 1,690 | 43 | 66 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Dally Randriantefy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #114 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #205 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #164 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #102 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |