H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Gigi Fernandez H2H: 2-1
Lisa Raymond holds a 2–1 lead over Gigi Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 1996 Philadelphia third round 6-1 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1996* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Lisa Raymond | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1995* | San Diego | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1992* | San Juan | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Gigi Fernandez | 7-5 6-3 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Gigi Fernandez | #181 | #17 | 247 | 1,912 | 227 | 217 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Gigi Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #23 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #112 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |