H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Irina Spirlea H2H: 2-1
Lisa Raymond holds a 2–1 lead over Irina Spirlea in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 1997 Filderstadt semifinal 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1997* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-3 6-1 | Irina Spirlea | Match data |
| Mar 24, 1996* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Irina Spirlea | 6-4 6-4 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jul 2, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Irina Spirlea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Irina Spirlea | #165 | #7 | 2,577 | 2,021 | 211 | 149 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Irina Spirlea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #61 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #21 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,993 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |