H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Iva Majoli H2H: 1-4
Iva Majoli holds a 4–1 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Iva Majoli leads 3–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 2001 Indian Wells second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2001* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-2 7-5 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2001* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Iva Majoli | 6-7(3) 6-2 7-6(1) | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1998* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Iva Majoli | 7-6 4-6 6-3 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Sep 30, 1994* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Iva Majoli | 6-0 6-4 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1994* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Iva Majoli | 6-3 2-6 6-1 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Iva Majoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |