H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Lisa Raymond holds a 4–0 lead over Jana Kandarr in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lisa Raymond leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 2000 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | 6-2 6-1 | Jana Kandarr | Match data | Jun 29, 2000* | R64 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Lisa Raymond | 6-3 6-3 | Jana Kandarr | Match data | May 13, 1998* | R64 | Berlin Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Lisa Raymond | 6-1 6-2 | Jana Kandarr | Match data | Apr 9, 1998* | R32 | Amelia Island | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
| Lisa Raymond | 7-6 6-2 | Jana Kandarr | Match data | Mar 12, 1997* | R64 | Indian Wells Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,946 | 327 | 273 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jana Kandarr | #459 | #43 | 687 | 1,658 | 68 | 120 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Jana Kandarr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #313 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #81 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #90 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #85 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #157 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,913 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #451 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #30 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,635 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,581 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Jana Kandarr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 1992 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1995 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1993 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1996 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1994 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1997 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1995 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1998 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1996 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1999 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1997 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2000 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1998 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2001 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 25 | 1999 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2002 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2000 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2003 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 21 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 175 | 152 | 327 | 53.5% | 45 | 48 | 93 | 48.4% | 53 | 36 | 89 | 59.6% | 54 | 37 | 91 | 59.3% | — | 25 | 45 | 70 | 35.7% | 36 | 51 | 87 | 41.4% | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Jana Kandarr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1989 | 1497 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 1480 | 94.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 1511 | 107.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.29 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.30 | 1994 | 1509 | 108.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.18 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1618 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | — | 51.9% | +0.15 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.38 | 1995 | 1560 | 124.3 | — | — | — | — | -52 | +76 | — | 42.1% | -0.71 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.48 |
| 19 | 1993 | 1692 | 137.1 | — | — | — | — | -34 | — | +15 | 54.4% | +0.51 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.3 | +0.84 | 1996 | 1576 | 115.6 | — | — | — | — | -53 | +57 | — | 34.6% | -1.48 | 6–2 (75%) | 4–4 (50%) | 107.9 | -0.80 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1749 | 138.6 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -122 | -60 | 55.2% | +0.24 | 5–10 (33%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.6 | +0.10 | 1997 | 1501 | 106.6 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +79 | — | 32.1% | -1.28 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–7 (30%) | 98.3 | +1.84 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1813 | 147.9 | — | — | — | — | -6 | — | -76 | 56.0% | +0.40 | 12–6 (67%) | 7–5 (58%) | 107.8 | +0.56 | 1998 | 1499 | 119.7 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +48 | — | 37.3% | -1.14 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.02 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1861 | 149.8 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -246 | -26 | 53.3% | +0.25 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.3 | -0.87 | 1999 | 1445 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | +37 | +60 | — | 20.8% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | — | -0.40 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1913 | 159.1 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -242 | -109 | 57.9% | +0.55 | 9–8 (53%) | 7–2 (78%) | 104.2 | -0.65 | 2000 | 1599 | 126.5 | — | — | — | — | -16 | -77 | -78 | 50.8% | -0.12 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.1 | -0.57 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1839 | 147.1 | — | — | — | — | +16 | -55 | -97 | 56.9% | +0.45 | 10–10 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | 98.2 | +0.54 | 2001 | 1579 | 122.2 | — | — | — | — | -24 | -22 | -88 | 38.7% | -0.79 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–7 (36%) | 98.7 | -2.15 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1784 | 143.4 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -60 | -17 | 49.5% | +0.06 | 9–10 (47%) | 5–6 (45%) | 98.1 | -0.50 | 2002 | 1533 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -24 | -24 | 38.0% | -0.80 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.5 | +0.40 |
| 26 | 2000 | 1795 | 141.6 | — | — | — | — | -33 | -118 | +163 | 55.0% | +0.43 | 9–8 (53%) | 2–6 (25%) | 96.1 | -0.19 | 2003 | 1538 | 105.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.67 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | 0.00 |
| 27 | 2001 | 1834 | 151.1 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -128 | +181 | 58.1% | +0.74 | 10–8 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 101.6 | -2.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 1755 | 138.0 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -113 | +316 | 54.5% | +0.35 | 8–4 (67%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.9 | +0.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 1766 | 139.9 | +1.58 | +1.47 | 1.097 | 52.3% | +23 | -87 | +216 | 53.8% | +0.08 | 13–7 (65%) | 7–4 (64%) | 105.7 | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 1760 | 142.2 | +2.54 | -0.29 | 1.089 | 51.9% | +66 | -171 | +175 | 48.9% | +0.05 | 10–6 (63%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.9 | +0.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 1635 | 122.3 | -3.26 | -0.74 | 0.782 | 44.6% | +87 | -100 | +170 | 43.2% | -0.10 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–2 (71%) | 103.1 | +2.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 1581 | 121.0 | +0.78 | -3.50 | 0.877 | 47.3% | +54 | -66 | +220 | 35.2% | -0.93 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.0 | -0.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 1565 | 98.6 | -2.01 | +0.33 | 0.601 | 42.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1947 | 150.2 | +0.86 | -1.52 | 0.940 | 48.9% | +12 | -115 | +91 | 53.0% | +0.26 | 113–94 (55%) | 71–64 (53%) | 102.4 | +0.25 | — | 1659 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -14 | +29 | -64 | 38.4% | -0.89 | 26–27 (49%) | 18–30 (38%) | 99.4 | -1.26 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | 8 | 7 | 15 | Aug 21, 2003 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 5 | 9 | 14 | Jun 17, 2004 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 4 | 10 | 14 | Mar 5, 2003 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 0 | 12 | 12 | Feb 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 3 | 8 | 11 | Feb 6, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 28, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jan 3, 2001 | H2H |
| Barbara Schett | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 14, 2000 | H2H |
| Lisa Raymond | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 29, 2000 | H2H |
| Sandrine Testud | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 13, 2002 | H2H |