H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lisa Raymond vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-3

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 3–0 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1995 US Open second round 6-2 1-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lisa Raymond
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 31, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 1-6 6-4 Lisa Raymond #19 Match data
Sep 4, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-2 Lisa Raymond #47 Match data
Mar 5, 1992* Boca Raton WTA 1000 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 7-5 6-3 Lisa Raymond #276 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,945 325 272 54.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lisa Raymond Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,617 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,691 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,813 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,859 0 1 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,910 0 1 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,837 0 1 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,795 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,767 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2004 18–18 50.0% #30 1,746 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,631 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,580 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8