H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lisa Raymond vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 1-0

Lisa Raymond holds a 1–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 1994 Zurich round of 32 6-4 3-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lisa Raymond
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lisa Raymond #48 6-4 3-6 7-6 Kristie Boogert #58 Match data Oct 6, 1994* R32 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,946 327 273 54.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 105 140 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lisa Raymond Kristie Boogert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0
18 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,618 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0
19 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,692 0 0 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,495 0 0
20 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0
21 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,812 0 0 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0
22 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,860 0 1 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,711 0 0
23 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,913 0 1 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,679 0 0
24 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,838 0 1 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,614 0 0
25 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,602 0 0
26 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,794 0 2 2000 12–14 46.2% #66 1,625 0 0
27 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,532 0 0
28 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,538 0 0
29 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,766 0 4 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0
30 2004 20–19 51.3% #30 1,760 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,635 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,581 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,564 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lisa Raymond Kristie Boogert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
18 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1995 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1995 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
22 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 1996 5 5 10 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1997 18 11 29 62.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1997 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1998 13 9 22 59.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1999 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 2000 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2000 6 6 12 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2002 21 14 35 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 2003 16 11 27 59.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 175 152 327 53.5% 45 48 93 48.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 54 37 91 59.3% — 42 51 93 45.2% 27 45 72 37.5% 19 20 39 48.7% 17 24 41 41.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lisa Raymond Kristie Boogert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1497 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1990 1480 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1511 107.5 — — — — +27 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 — — +0.30 1991 1470 105.5 — — — — +28 — — 11.1% -1.89 0–1 — — -0.25
18 1992 1618 137.7 — — — — +26 — — 51.9% +0.15 1–0 0–2 — +0.38 1992 1451 100.6 — — — — — +76 — 27.3% -1.55 0–1 1–1 — +0.26
19 1993 1692 137.1 — — — — -34 — +15 54.4% +0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 +0.84 1993 1495 122.3 — — — — +35 +34 +66 40.7% -0.55 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 +0.78
20 1994 1749 138.6 — — — — -41 -122 -60 55.2% +0.24 5–10 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 +0.10 1994 1592 135.8 — — — — +2 -42 +10 51.9% +0.12 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.5 +1.08
21 1995 1813 147.9 — — — — -6 — -76 56.0% +0.40 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 107.8 +0.56 1995 1752 145.9 — — — — -20 -150 -154 55.7% +0.67 7–5 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 103.9 -0.03
22 1996 1861 149.8 — — — — 0 -246 -26 53.3% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.87 1996 1712 132.3 — — — — -27 -121 -11 47.9% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 1–0 — -0.75
23 1997 1913 159.1 — — — — +23 -242 -109 57.9% +0.55 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) 104.2 -0.65 1997 1679 128.2 — — — — +33 -110 0 38.9% -0.78 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.78
24 1998 1839 147.1 — — — — +16 -55 -97 56.9% +0.45 10–10 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 98.2 +0.54 1998 1614 117.4 — — — — -22 -70 +161 47.4% +0.19 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 -0.21
25 1999 1784 143.4 — — — — +11 -60 -17 49.5% +0.06 9–10 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 98.1 -0.50 1999 1603 113.2 — — — — -45 -59 +158 44.7% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 -0.49
26 2000 1795 141.6 — — — — -33 -118 +163 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 -0.19 2000 1625 123.8 — — — — -9 -63 +115 47.5% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 99.6 -0.14
27 2001 1834 151.1 — — — — -13 -128 +181 58.1% +0.74 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -2.05 2001 1533 108.3 — — — — +60 -52 +187 38.7% -0.71 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +0.09
28 2002 1755 138.0 — — — — +6 -113 +316 54.5% +0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 +0.97 2002 1538 108.4 — — — — +61 -69 — 46.7% -0.13 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
29 2003 1766 139.9 +1.58 +1.47 1.097 52.3% +23 -87 +216 53.8% +0.08 13–7 (65%) 7–4 (64%) 105.7 +0.07 2003 1532 103.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.12
30 2004 1760 142.2 +2.54 -0.29 1.089 51.9% +66 -171 +175 48.9% +0.05 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1635 122.3 -3.26 -0.74 0.782 44.6% +87 -100 +170 43.2% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.1 +2.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 1581 121.0 +0.78 -3.50 0.877 47.3% +54 -66 +220 35.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 96.0 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 1565 98.6 -2.01 +0.33 0.601 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 150.2 +0.86 -1.52 0.940 48.9% +12 -115 +91 53.0% +0.26 113–94 (55%) 71–64 (53%) 102.4 +0.25 — 1770 133.9 — — — — +1 -62 +68 46.4% -0.14 32–52 (38%) 20–24 (45%) 96.0 -0.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.