H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 1-0
Lisa Raymond holds a 1–0 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 1999 Amelia Island second round 3-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1999* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Lisa Raymond | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lisa Raymond | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |