H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Linda Wild H2H: 1-2
Linda Wild holds a 2–1 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Linda Wild leads 1–0 on carpet, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 1997 Hilton Head second round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1997* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Lisa Raymond | 6-0 6-1 | Linda Wild | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1994* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Linda Wild | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1993* | Sapporo | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Linda Wild | 7-6 6-1 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |