H2H data updated: 2026-11-01 00:00 UTC

Lisa Raymond vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 0-1

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 1–0 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1992 Canadian Open round of 32 6-2 6-1.

USA Age 53 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
SUI Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #9 6-2 6-1 Lisa Raymond #289 Match data Aug 20, 1992* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lisa Raymond — #15 1,695 1,946 327 273 54.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere — #3 148 2,131 464 185 71.5% 0 1 0 2 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lisa Raymond Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0 1982 15–10 60.0% — 1,687 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0 1983 21–16 56.8% — 1,789 0 0
17 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,100 0 5
18 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,618 0 0 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,075 0 6
19 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,692 0 0 1986 42–21 66.7% #8 1,992 0 6
20 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,114 0 8
21 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,812 0 0 1988 45–15 75.0% #6 2,102 0 10
22 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,860 0 1 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,019 0 12
23 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,913 0 1 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,068 0 12
24 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,838 0 1 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,028 0 15
25 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1 1992 34–13 72.3% #9 1,998 0 16
26 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,794 0 2 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,046 0 18
27 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2 1994 12–2 85.7% — 2,067 0 19
28 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,766 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2004 20–19 51.3% #30 1,760 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,635 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,581 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2007 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lisa Raymond Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
16 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1991 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 27 5 32 84.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0%
18 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1985 7 4 11 63.6% 16 6 22 72.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 5 18 72.2%
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1986 13 5 18 72.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 8 17 52.9%
20 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 9 3 12 75.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4%
21 1995 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1988 23 5 28 82.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
22 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 1989 15 5 20 75.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5%
23 1997 18 11 29 62.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1990 19 6 25 76.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7%
24 1998 13 9 22 59.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 17 4 21 81.0%
25 1999 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 1992 13 4 17 76.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
26 2000 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1993 16 5 21 76.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
27 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — 8 1 9 88.9%
28 2002 21 14 35 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 16 11 27 59.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 175 152 327 53.5% 45 48 93 48.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 54 37 91 59.3% — 145 53 198 73.2% 156 62 218 71.6% 38 20 58 65.5% 125 50 175 71.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lisa Raymond Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1497 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17 1982 1688 121.9 — — — — -90 -61 -1 55.2% +0.14 6–2 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +1.43
16 1990 1480 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23 1983 1789 136.5 — — — — -119 0 -127 57.1% +0.45 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.63
17 1991 1511 107.5 — — — — +27 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 — — +0.30 1984 2101 169.3 — — — — -162 +36 -328 70.4% +1.55 13–7 (65%) 6–2 (75%) 112.6 -2.55
18 1992 1619 137.7 — — — — +25 — — 51.9% +0.15 1–0 0–2 — +0.38 1985 2076 161.5 — — — — -48 +9 -203 70.6% +1.90 6–4 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -0.41
19 1993 1692 137.1 — — — — -33 — +15 54.4% +0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 +0.84 1986 1993 161.5 — — — — -5 +31 -52 65.7% +1.31 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 90.3 -2.26
20 1994 1749 138.6 — — — — -41 -122 -60 55.2% +0.24 5–10 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 +0.10 1987 2114 165.7 — — — — -24 -9 -172 68.6% +1.51 14–8 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 -4.28
21 1995 1813 147.9 — — — — -6 — -76 56.0% +0.40 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 107.8 +0.56 1988 2102 162.5 — — — — +47 -48 — 73.1% +1.85 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.56
22 1996 1861 149.8 — — — — 0 -246 -26 53.3% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.87 1989 2019 154.6 — — — — +29 +17 — 69.0% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +1.23
23 1997 1913 159.1 — — — — +24 -242 -109 57.9% +0.55 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) 104.2 -0.65 1990 2069 173.2 — — — — +56 -42 — 68.5% +1.77 9–7 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.3 -2.84
24 1998 1838 147.2 — — — — +17 -54 -101 56.9% +0.45 10–10 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 98.2 +0.55 1991 2028 159.2 — — — — +51 +26 — 72.7% +1.77 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 +1.33
25 1999 1784 143.5 — — — — +11 -60 -17 49.5% +0.06 9–10 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 98.1 -0.49 1992 1999 152.0 — — — — +87 +17 -91 67.0% +1.41 10–3 (77%) 2–4 (33%) 101.2 +2.30
26 2000 1795 141.6 — — — — -33 -118 +164 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 -0.19 1993 2046 159.7 — — — — +80 -115 — 65.8% +1.04 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -0.01
27 2001 1834 151.1 — — — — -13 -128 +179 58.1% +0.74 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -2.05 1994 2068 143.1 — — — — +47 — — 77.4% +2.36 3–0 (100%) 0–2 — +0.52
28 2002 1755 138.0 — — — — +6 -113 +316 54.5% +0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1767 139.9 +1.58 +1.47 1.097 52.3% +22 -88 +215 53.8% +0.08 13–7 (65%) 7–4 (64%) 105.7 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1760 142.2 +2.54 -0.29 1.089 51.9% +66 -171 +175 48.9% +0.05 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1635 122.3 -3.26 -0.74 0.782 44.6% +87 -100 +170 43.2% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.1 +2.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 1581 121.0 +0.78 -3.50 0.877 47.3% +54 -66 +220 35.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 96.0 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 1565 98.6 -2.01 +0.33 0.601 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 150.2 +0.86 -1.52 0.940 48.9% +12 -114 +90 53.0% +0.26 113–94 (55%) 71–64 (53%) 102.4 +0.26 — 2131 166.2 — — — — +15 -4 -134 68.1% +1.46 97–70 (58%) 48–41 (54%) 101.4 -1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.