H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-0
Lisa Raymond holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 1994 Eastbourne third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1994* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Lisa Raymond | 6-2 6-0 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lisa Raymond | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |