H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Monica Seles H2H: 2-2
Lisa Raymond and Monica Seles are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Lisa Raymond leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 2002 Stanford quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2002* | Stanford | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 6-2 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2000* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-3 6-2 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1998* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lisa Raymond | 7-6 6-4 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Monica Seles | 7-5 6-0 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 578 | 121 | 82.7% | 9 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 53 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Monica Seles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,295 | 1 | 10 |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,443 | 4 | 20 |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,499 | 7 | 30 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,485 | 8 | 32 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,487 | 8 | 33 |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #2 | 2,342 | 9 | 38 |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,159 | 9 | 41 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,174 | 9 | 43 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,116 | 9 | 44 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 51–12 | 81.0% | #4 | 2,144 | 9 | 47 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,127 | 9 | 51 |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,088 | 9 | 53 |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,993 | 9 | 53 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |