Home
/
H2H
/
Lisa Raymond vs Natasha Zvereva
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 5-6
Natasha Zvereva holds a 6–5 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 2000 Eastbourne Open round of 32 7-5 6-3.
Quick comparisons
Aryna Sabalenka vs Iga Swiatek Aryna Sabalenka vs Elena Rybakina
Serena Williams vs Venus Williams Martina Navratilova vs Chris Evert
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5
–
6
11 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Natasha Zvereva
#65
7-5 6-3
Lisa Raymond
#21
Match data
Jun 22, 2000*
R32
Eastbourne Open
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Grass
Natasha Zvereva
#30
1-6 6-3 6-2
Lisa Raymond
#26
Match data
Mar 15, 2000*
R64
Indian Wells Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Lisa Raymond
#28
6-4 6-4
Natasha Zvereva
#18
Match data
Mar 10, 1999*
R64
Indian Wells Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Natasha Zvereva
#18
6-3 6-2
Lisa Raymond
#27
Match data
Feb 5, 1999*
R16
Pan Pacific Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Carpet
Lisa Raymond
#18
6-2 6-2
Natasha Zvereva
#16
Match data
Sep 3, 1998*
R64
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Lisa Raymond
#47
6-2 7-5
Natasha Zvereva
#30
Match data
Oct 17, 1996*
R32
Zurich
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Natasha Zvereva
#9
7-5 7-6
Lisa Raymond
#29
Match data
Feb 27, 1995
R16
Indian Wells Open
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Lisa Raymond
#44
7-6 7-6
Natasha Zvereva
#8
Match data
Feb 10, 1995*
R16
Chicago
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Carpet
Natasha Zvereva
#12
6-3 3-6 6-4
Lisa Raymond
#56
Match data
Mar 31, 1994*
R32
Hilton Head
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Clay
Natasha Zvereva
#25
6-4 6-1
Lisa Raymond
#55
Match data
Sep 2, 1993*
R64
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Lisa Raymond
#84
6-4 7-6
Natasha Zvereva
#23
Match data
Jun 17, 1993*
R32
Eastbourne Open
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Grass
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Lisa Raymond
#884
#15
1,695
1,946
327
273
54.5%
0
0
0
0
4
4
Natasha Zvereva
#201
#5
1,820
2,074
394
236
62.5%
0
0
0
2
3
5
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
15
1989
0–1
0.0%
#449
1,496
0
0
1986
4–2
66.7%
#94
1,575
0
0
16
1990
0–1
0.0%
#336
1,480
0
0
1987
21–11
65.6%
#19
1,835
0
0
17
1991
2–1
66.7%
#257
1,510
0
0
1988
40–18
69.0%
#7
1,997
0
0
18
1992
7–6
53.8%
#75
1,618
0
0
1989
23–17
57.5%
#27
1,804
0
0
19
1993
13–12
52.0%
#55
1,692
0
0
1990
38–15
71.7%
#12
1,953
0
2
20
1994
19–17
52.8%
#44
1,749
0
0
1991
29–18
61.7%
#21
1,912
0
2
21
1995
25–16
61.0%
#20
1,812
0
0
1992
34–20
63.0%
#23
1,981
0
2
22
1996
23–19
54.8%
#27
1,860
0
1
1993
37–19
66.1%
#19
1,973
0
2
23
1997
31–21
59.6%
#17
1,913
0
1
1994
29–12
70.7%
#10
1,979
0
3
24
1998
29–21
58.0%
#27
1,838
0
1
1995
31–17
64.6%
#14
1,970
0
3
25
1999
22–23
48.9%
#28
1,784
0
1
1996
13–13
50.0%
#57
1,897
0
3
26
2000
26–20
56.5%
#30
1,794
0
2
1997
25–20
55.6%
#25
1,907
0
3
27
2001
33–21
61.1%
#22
1,833
0
2
1998
35–21
62.5%
#16
1,934
0
4
28
2002
29–21
58.0%
#29
1,755
0
3
1999
24–19
55.8%
#27
1,824
0
5
29
2003
25–18
58.1%
#27
1,766
0
4
2000
11–13
45.8%
#78
1,733
0
5
30
2004
20–19
51.3%
#30
1,760
0
4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31
2005
14–19
42.4%
#74
1,635
0
4
2002
0–1
0.0%
—
1,708
0
5
32
2006
9–16
36.0%
#128
1,581
0
4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
2007
0–1
0.0%
#884
1,564
0
4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
15
1989
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1986
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
4
1
5
80.0%
16
1990
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1987
8
5
13
61.5%
3
2
5
60.0%
4
2
6
66.7%
6
2
8
75.0%
17
1991
2
1
3
66.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1988
16
10
26
61.5%
9
2
11
81.8%
8
2
10
80.0%
7
4
11
63.6%
18
1992
5
5
10
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2
1
3
66.7%
1989
12
6
18
66.7%
5
5
10
50.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
4
4
8
50.0%
19
1993
3
6
9
33.3%
—
—
—
—
5
2
7
71.4%
5
4
9
55.6%
1990
15
3
18
83.3%
12
5
17
70.6%
7
2
9
77.8%
4
5
9
44.4%
20
1994
8
8
16
50.0%
5
4
9
55.6%
3
2
5
60.0%
3
3
6
50.0%
1991
13
8
21
61.9%
8
4
12
66.7%
5
2
7
71.4%
3
4
7
42.9%
21
1995
14
10
24
58.3%
1
1
2
50.0%
4
2
6
66.7%
6
3
9
66.7%
1992
7
7
14
50.0%
16
6
22
72.7%
5
2
7
71.4%
6
5
11
54.5%
22
1996
10
10
20
50.0%
1
3
4
25.0%
4
3
7
57.1%
8
3
11
72.7%
1993
15
6
21
71.4%
8
5
13
61.5%
5
2
7
71.4%
9
6
15
60.0%
23
1997
18
11
29
62.1%
4
3
7
57.1%
3
3
6
50.0%
6
4
10
60.0%
1994
7
4
11
63.6%
7
3
10
70.0%
3
2
5
60.0%
12
3
15
80.0%
24
1998
13
9
22
59.1%
11
5
16
68.8%
0
3
3
0.0%
5
4
9
55.6%
1995
17
8
25
68.0%
6
3
9
66.7%
5
2
7
71.4%
3
4
7
42.9%
25
1999
8
12
20
40.0%
4
5
9
44.4%
4
3
7
57.1%
6
3
9
66.7%
1996
6
6
12
50.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
3
3
6
50.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
26
2000
6
8
14
42.9%
5
5
10
50.0%
9
2
11
81.8%
6
5
11
54.5%
1997
15
10
25
60.0%
5
4
9
55.6%
5
3
8
62.5%
0
3
3
0.0%
27
2001
18
12
30
60.0%
5
4
9
55.6%
7
3
10
70.0%
3
2
5
60.0%
1998
15
10
25
60.0%
6
4
10
60.0%
9
2
11
81.8%
5
5
10
50.0%
28
2002
21
14
35
60.0%
2
4
6
33.3%
6
2
8
75.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
1999
8
9
17
47.1%
6
6
12
50.0%
8
2
10
80.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
29
2003
16
11
27
59.3%
3
2
5
60.0%
3
3
6
50.0%
3
2
5
60.0%
2000
3
5
8
37.5%
5
5
10
50.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
30
2004
18
12
30
60.0%
1
4
5
20.0%
1
2
3
33.3%
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31
2005
11
12
23
47.8%
2
4
6
33.3%
1
3
4
25.0%
—
—
—
—
2002
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
32
2006
4
8
12
33.3%
1
4
5
20.0%
3
3
6
50.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
2007
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
175
152
327
53.5%
45
48
93
48.4%
53
36
89
59.6%
54
37
91
59.3%
—
157
98
255
61.6%
98
56
154
63.6%
71
31
102
69.6%
68
51
119
57.1%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.