H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Lisa Raymond vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 5-6

Natasha Zvereva holds a 6–5 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 2000 Eastbourne Open round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lisa Raymond
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5 – 6
11 main-draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Natasha Zvereva #65 7-5 6-3 Lisa Raymond #21 Match data Jun 22, 2000* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Natasha Zvereva #30 1-6 6-3 6-2 Lisa Raymond #26 Match data Mar 15, 2000* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lisa Raymond #28 6-4 6-4 Natasha Zvereva #18 Match data Mar 10, 1999* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Natasha Zvereva #18 6-3 6-2 Lisa Raymond #27 Match data Feb 5, 1999* R16 Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Lisa Raymond #18 6-2 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #16 Match data Sep 3, 1998* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lisa Raymond #47 6-2 7-5 Natasha Zvereva #30 Match data Oct 17, 1996* R32 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Natasha Zvereva #9 7-5 7-6 Lisa Raymond #29 Match data Feb 27, 1995 R16 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lisa Raymond #44 7-6 7-6 Natasha Zvereva #8 Match data Feb 10, 1995* R16 Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Natasha Zvereva #12 6-3 3-6 6-4 Lisa Raymond #56 Match data Mar 31, 1994* R32 Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Natasha Zvereva #25 6-4 6-1 Lisa Raymond #55 Match data Sep 2, 1993* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lisa Raymond #84 6-4 7-6 Natasha Zvereva #23 Match data Jun 17, 1993* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,946 327 273 54.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,074 393 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lisa Raymond Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,836 0 0
17 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0
18 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,618 0 0 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,805 0 0
19 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,692 0 0 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2
20 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,812 0 0 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2
22 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,860 0 1 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2
23 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,913 0 1 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3
24 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,838 0 1 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3
26 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,794 0 2 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3
27 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2 1998 34–21 61.8% #16 1,927 0 3
28 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,823 0 4
29 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,766 0 4 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,732 0 4
30 2004 20–19 51.3% #30 1,760 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,635 0 4 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,707 0 4
32 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,581 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,564 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lisa Raymond Natasha Zvereva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
16 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
17 1991 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
18 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
19 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1995 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5%
22 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0%
23 1997 18 11 29 62.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0%
24 1998 13 9 22 59.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1999 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2000 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 2002 21 14 35 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2003 16 11 27 59.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 175 152 327 53.5% 45 48 93 48.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 54 37 91 59.3% — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 70 31 101 69.3% 68 51 119 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lisa Raymond Natasha Zvereva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1497 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17 1986 1575 112.5 — — — — +64 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.83
16 1990 1480 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23 1987 1836 140.6 — — — — -22 -248 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.47
17 1991 1511 107.5 — — — — +27 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 — — +0.30 1988 1998 161.3 — — — — -75 -214 -184 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -3.11
18 1992 1619 137.7 — — — — +25 — — 51.9% +0.15 1–0 0–2 — +0.38 1989 1805 144.2 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 +0.27
19 1993 1692 137.1 — — — — -33 — +15 54.4% +0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 +0.84 1990 1954 156.9 — — — — -79 -42 -37 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92
20 1994 1749 138.6 — — — — -41 -122 -60 55.2% +0.24 5–10 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 +0.10 1991 1912 148.9 — — — — -65 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24
21 1995 1813 147.9 — — — — -6 — -76 56.0% +0.40 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 107.8 +0.56 1992 1982 158.4 — — — — -114 +58 +52 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82
22 1996 1861 149.8 — — — — 0 -246 -26 53.3% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.87 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +89 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50
23 1997 1913 159.1 — — — — +24 -242 -109 57.9% +0.55 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) 104.2 -0.65 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08
24 1998 1838 147.2 — — — — +17 -54 -101 56.9% +0.45 10–10 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 98.2 +0.55 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19
25 1999 1784 143.5 — — — — +11 -60 -17 49.5% +0.06 9–10 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 98.1 -0.49 1996 1898 147.8 — — — — +44 +38 +90 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77
26 2000 1795 141.6 — — — — -33 -118 +164 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 -0.19 1997 1908 154.8 — — — — +10 +4 +80 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07
27 2001 1834 151.1 — — — — -13 -128 +179 58.1% +0.74 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -2.05 1998 1928 157.5 — — — — -30 -3 +182 60.3% +0.46 6–5 (55%) 4–4 (50%) 98.9 -2.91
28 2002 1755 138.0 — — — — +6 -113 +316 54.5% +0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 +0.97 1999 1823 141.3 — — — — +4 +2 +266 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.71
29 2003 1767 139.9 +1.58 +1.47 1.097 52.3% +22 -88 +215 53.8% +0.08 13–7 (65%) 7–4 (64%) 105.7 +0.07 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +386 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52
30 2004 1760 142.2 +2.54 -0.29 1.089 51.9% +66 -171 +175 48.9% +0.05 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1635 122.3 -3.26 -0.74 0.782 44.6% +87 -100 +170 43.2% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.1 +2.00 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15
32 2006 1581 121.0 +0.78 -3.50 0.877 47.3% +54 -66 +220 35.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 96.0 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 1565 98.6 -2.01 +0.33 0.601 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 150.2 +0.86 -1.52 0.940 48.9% +12 -114 +90 53.0% +0.26 113–94 (55%) 71–64 (53%) 102.4 +0.25 — 2074 160.8 — — — — -23 -14 +52 60.5% +0.69 96–63 (60%) 77–61 (56%) 107.8 -2.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.