H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lisa Raymond vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 5-6
Natasha Zvereva holds a 6–5 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 2000 Eastbourne third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5
–
6
11 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2000* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Natasha Zvereva | 7-5 6-3 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2000* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Natasha Zvereva | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1999* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 6-4 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1999* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Natasha Zvereva | 6-3 6-2 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-2 6-2 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1996* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-2 7-5 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Mar 3, 1995* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Natasha Zvereva | 7-5 7-6 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Feb 10, 1995* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Lisa Raymond | 7-6 7-6 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1994* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Natasha Zvereva | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1993* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Natasha Zvereva | 6-4 6-1 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Jun 17, 1993* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 7-6 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lisa Raymond | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |